5.9 sec in total
223 ms
5.6 sec
160 ms
Click here to check amazing Indamail content for Hungary. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about indamail.hu
Üdvözöl az új Indamail!
Visit indamail.huWe analyzed Indamail.hu page load time and found that the first response time was 223 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Indamail.hu rating and web reputation
indamail.hu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value2,500 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.098
90/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
223 ms
388 ms
410 ms
357 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Indamail.hu, 19% (21 requests) were made to Img.vipmail.hu and 8% (9 requests) were made to Ad.adverticum.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (683 ms) relates to the external source Img.vipmail.hu.
Page size can be reduced by 381.7 kB (47%)
809.9 kB
428.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Indamail.hu main page is 809.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 429.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Indamail needs image optimization as it can save up to 78.8 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 273.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 273.2 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indamail.hu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (65%)
104
36
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indamail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
indamail.hu
223 ms
main.css
388 ms
style.css
410 ms
ip_services.20090527.js
357 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
script.js
199 ms
bg-body.png
414 ms
pic-2gb.png
116 ms
pic-oriascsat.png
209 ms
pic-dragndrop.png
234 ms
pic-theme.png
235 ms
pic-email.png
235 ms
pic-spam.png
231 ms
pic-help.png
312 ms
pic-pass.png
348 ms
indamail_nyito_invitel_logoval.jpg
347 ms
logo-vip.png
350 ms
logo-index.png
350 ms
b-headbg.jpg
410 ms
indamail_mobil_ujbelepo.png
683 ms
sprite.png
456 ms
bglifej.png
454 ms
regbtn.png
454 ms
bg-boxfej.png
506 ms
bg-footet.png
508 ms
ga.js
4 ms
track.cgi
233 ms
xgemius.js
357 ms
__utm.gif
27 ms
goa3.js
457 ms
fpdata.js
125 ms
lsget.html
366 ms
181 ms
redot.gif
251 ms
redot.gif
624 ms
detect.js
123 ms
kontroll.css
121 ms
kontroll_logo_indapass.gif
229 ms
redot.gif
125 ms
rexdot.js
184 ms
redot.gif
126 ms
z
224 ms
3360101.html
150 ms
1x1.png
252 ms
external2.js
112 ms
doDocWrite.js
245 ms
gwloader.js
233 ms
goAdverticum1.25.js
113 ms
13842.js
20 ms
sync
18 ms
314304-15.js
152 ms
13808.js
6 ms
sync
10 ms
314312-15.js
151 ms
0RUzkccJHx_573227944.html
7 ms
emily.html
39 ms
emily.html
47 ms
emily.html
41 ms
cl
48 ms
creative_add_on.js
66 ms
emily.html
45 ms
552 ms
lidar.js
62 ms
controltag
57 ms
rs.js
45 ms
analytics.js
48 ms
smart_tag.js
282 ms
g-3295.xgi
43 ms
tap.php
26 ms
j-1439489-1151259.js
79 ms
ftpagefold_v4.4.0.js
154 ms
controltag.js.3269b976cac0388f80dbfdb09d96a4e7
65 ms
rpc.flow
111 ms
vce_st.js
56 ms
loaded.js
19 ms
surly.js
107 ms
p2
91 ms
postback
86 ms
ai.htm
260 ms
a.gif
181 ms
p
24 ms
p
25 ms
ba.html
32 ms
cms-2c.html
59 ms
postback
23 ms
4.gif
22 ms
1151259.gif
44 ms
2532.js
11 ms
2964
47 ms
Pug
46 ms
rum
21 ms
tap.php
11 ms
pixel
70 ms
demconf.jpg
34 ms
sd
36 ms
pixel.gif
65 ms
sync
32 ms
rum
37 ms
385636.gif
29 ms
postback
24 ms
m.gif
6 ms
match-result
39 ms
rs
9 ms
m_yahoo.gif
5 ms
get
58 ms
optout_check
7 ms
box_19_top-right.png
12 ms
ci.png
12 ms
indamail.hu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
indamail.hu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
indamail.hu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
HU
HU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indamail.hu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hungarian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indamail.hu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
indamail.hu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Indamail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: