8.5 sec in total
528 ms
7.4 sec
519 ms
Visit indejur.com now to see the best up-to-date INDeJUR content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about indejur.com
INDeJUR - Somos Parte de tu Formación Jurídica
Visit indejur.comWe analyzed Indejur.com page load time and found that the first response time was 528 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
indejur.com performance score
528 ms
15 ms
276 ms
143 ms
254 ms
Our browser made a total of 187 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (141 requests) were addressed to the original Indejur.com, 7% (13 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (8 requests) were made to Static.olark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Indejur.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (15%)
14.4 MB
12.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Indejur.com main page is 14.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 113.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.7 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 649.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INDeJUR images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 291.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indejur.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 291.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (34%)
180
118
The browser has sent 180 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INDeJUR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
indejur.com
528 ms
jquery-latest.js
15 ms
lightbox.css
276 ms
style.css
143 ms
jquery.js
254 ms
jquery.min.js
47 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
317 ms
camera.js
351 ms
bootstrap.js
478 ms
superfish.js
409 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
404 ms
jquery.jcarousel.js
472 ms
jquery.tweet.js
467 ms
myscript.js
471 ms
css
42 ms
prettyPhoto.css
640 ms
camera.css
606 ms
bootstrap.css
779 ms
theme.css
641 ms
skin.css
612 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
671 ms
jquery.js
1445 ms
amazingcarousel.js
989 ms
initcarousel-1.css
811 ms
initcarousel-1.js
811 ms
css
73 ms
close.png
595 ms
loading.gif
596 ms
prev.png
606 ms
next.png
1022 ms
css
12 ms
logo.png
205 ms
bootstrap-carousel.html
352 ms
maps
204 ms
top_socials.png
463 ms
34.jpg
714 ms
cofopri.jpg
719 ms
adminsitrativo.jpg
573 ms
ambiental.jpg
603 ms
cofopri2.jpg
713 ms
14.jpg
715 ms
15.jpg
716 ms
16.jpg
1130 ms
17.jpg
718 ms
18.jpg
983 ms
19.jpg
887 ms
20.jpg
990 ms
21.jpg
887 ms
22.jpg
989 ms
23.jpg
1182 ms
24.jpg
1045 ms
25.jpg
1182 ms
26.jpg
1182 ms
27.jpg
1373 ms
28.jpg
1210 ms
29.jpg
1365 ms
30.jpg
1396 ms
35.jpg
1751 ms
31.jpg
1287 ms
32.jpg
1443 ms
33.jpg
1372 ms
6.jpg
1515 ms
7.jpg
1597 ms
8.jpg
1910 ms
9.jpg
1582 ms
10.jpg
1581 ms
11.jpg
1689 ms
12.jpg
1768 ms
loader0.js
159 ms
css
62 ms
v1.jpg
1941 ms
embed
169 ms
9442-500-10-1978.js
30 ms
c
103 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1697 ms
js
145 ms
init_embed.js
139 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
1560 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1324 ms
docs.min.js
1468 ms
common.js
102 ms
map.js
94 ms
google4.png
30 ms
overlay.js
25 ms
util.js
190 ms
onion.js
150 ms
search_impl.js
188 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
476 ms
ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js
1390 ms
jssor.slider.mini.js
1491 ms
v2.jpg
1610 ms
v3.jpg
1634 ms
v4.jpg
1640 ms
v5.jpg
1602 ms
stats.js
204 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
178 ms
kh
179 ms
transparent.png
121 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
104 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
160 ms
v6.jpg
1617 ms
v7.jpg
1705 ms
controls.js
72 ms
v8.jpg
1647 ms
v9.jpg
1640 ms
v10.jpg
1705 ms
v11.jpg
1624 ms
vt
164 ms
vt
157 ms
css
90 ms
entity11.png
86 ms
vt
155 ms
vt
182 ms
vt
169 ms
v12.jpg
1839 ms
mapcnt6.png
66 ms
v13.jpg
1803 ms
v14.jpg
1956 ms
v15.jpg
1877 ms
application2.js
128 ms
tmapctrl.png
31 ms
v16.jpg
2126 ms
v17.jpg
1700 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
63 ms
v18.jpg
1877 ms
v19.jpg
1990 ms
v20.jpg
2185 ms
v21.jpg
2529 ms
storage.html
124 ms
v22.jpg
2357 ms
v23.jpg
2276 ms
storage.js
42 ms
v24.jpg
2288 ms
v25.jpg
2254 ms
v26.jpg
2548 ms
visits
259 ms
481d968051bc01250703cecff943f488.css
33 ms
log.png
85 ms
v27.jpg
2399 ms
1a3dd27e65df38cc0fedd71ab57c1754.png
93 ms
buttons-light.png
69 ms
v28.jpg
2354 ms
2.png
2290 ms
ico1.jpg
2099 ms
ico2.jpg
2131 ms
ico3.jpg
2156 ms
ico5.jpg
2116 ms
ico4.jpg
2084 ms
barra1.jpg
2172 ms
br1.jpg
2278 ms
minislider.html
1959 ms
slider1.html
1986 ms
foot_logo.png
1971 ms
lightbox-next.png
1957 ms
lightbox-prev.png
2012 ms
lightbox-close.png
1865 ms
bottomshadow-110-95-3.png
1777 ms
arrows-48-48-3.png
1773 ms
hoveroverlay-64-64-3.png
1752 ms
icon3.png
1865 ms
1.jpg
1872 ms
loading.gif
1482 ms
b21.png
1493 ms
a21.png
1510 ms
1.jpg
1923 ms
2.jpg
1741 ms
wowslider.js
285 ms
script.js
326 ms
1.jpg
436 ms
2.jpg
431 ms
3.jpg
454 ms
4.jpg
464 ms
5.jpg
570 ms
6.jpg
573 ms
7.jpg
619 ms
8.jpg
635 ms
9.jpg
811 ms
10.jpg
818 ms
style.css
877 ms
jquery.js
965 ms
wowslider.js
857 ms
script.js
875 ms
1.jpg
144 ms
2.jpg
186 ms
3.jpg
193 ms
4.jpg
157 ms
shadow.png
115 ms
indejur.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indejur.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Indejur.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
indejur.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INDeJUR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: