4.4 sec in total
989 ms
3.1 sec
332 ms
Click here to check amazing Indianask content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about indianask.com
Visit indianask.comWe analyzed Indianask.com page load time and found that the first response time was 989 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
indianask.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value300 ms
79/100
30%
Value0.863
4/100
15%
Value2.9 s
96/100
10%
989 ms
154 ms
120 ms
79 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Indianask.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (989 ms) belongs to the original domain Indianask.com.
Page size can be reduced by 851.6 kB (64%)
1.3 MB
487.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Indianask.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 688.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Indianask images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 455.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 455.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 322.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indianask.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 322.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (69%)
55
17
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indianask. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.indianask.com
989 ms
autoptimize_062fc5b01e65b195260902b0e6a6f5b3.php
154 ms
jquery.js
120 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
79 ms
js.min.js
77 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
80 ms
jquery.cookie.js
110 ms
public.js
213 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
214 ms
html5.js
215 ms
jquery.tweet.js
217 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
217 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
230 ms
jquery.tipsy.js
231 ms
tabs.js
232 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
232 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
267 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
276 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
304 ms
jquery.nav.js
306 ms
tags.js
309 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
349 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
342 ms
core.min.js
353 ms
widget.min.js
382 ms
mouse.min.js
380 ms
sortable.min.js
384 ms
custom.js
420 ms
adsbygoogle.js
7 ms
jquery.form.min.js
416 ms
scripts.js
418 ms
modernizr.js
501 ms
wp-embed.min.js
458 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
300 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
ecd82d17401b2f577bae9067fef17c47
97 ms
indiasks.png
117 ms
indian-ask-for-help-65x65.png
116 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
686 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
177 ms
fontello.woff
181 ms
ca-pub-4717899670506901.js
85 ms
zrt_lookup.html
156 ms
show_ads_impl.js
80 ms
collect
603 ms
ads
541 ms
osd.js
214 ms
loading.gif
510 ms
ads
255 ms
11606258358037467783
78 ms
abg.js
80 ms
m_js_controller.js
91 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
77 ms
ads
299 ms
s
49 ms
x_button_blue2.png
48 ms
favicon
65 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
14 ms
j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js
4 ms
2540411879970011212
21 ms
indianask.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
<object> elements do not have alternate text
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
indianask.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
indianask.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indianask.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Indianask.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
indianask.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Indianask. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: