Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

Page Load Speed

30 ms in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

16 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

indiecurrent.com screenshot

About Website

Visit indiecurrent.com now to see the best up-to-date Indiecurrent content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about indiecurrent.com

Visit indiecurrent.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Indiecurrent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 16 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

indiecurrent.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.185

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

indiecurrent.com

14 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Indiecurrent.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14 ms) belongs to the original domain Indiecurrent.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (44%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Indiecurrent.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 23 B

  • Original 127 B
  • After minification 127 B
  • After compression 104 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23 B or 18% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 172.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Indiecurrent needs image optimization as it can save up to 172.2 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 520.4 kB

  • Original 743.2 kB
  • After minification 673.0 kB
  • After compression 222.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 520.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 386.8 kB

  • Original 496.5 kB
  • After minification 421.0 kB
  • After compression 109.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indiecurrent.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 386.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

indiecurrent.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

indiecurrent.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

indiecurrent.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indiecurrent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Indiecurrent.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Indiecurrent. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: