Tools & Wizards About Us
indigo.am screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

indigo.am

Indigo Branding Agency – Branding | Packaging | Graphic Design

Page Load Speed

12.9 sec in total

First Response

320 ms

Resources Loaded

12.3 sec

Page Rendered

332 ms

indigo.am screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Indigo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about indigo.am

We design success by shifting brands to the next stage of evolution. Branding | Packaging Design | Logo Design | Naming | Web Design | SMM

Visit indigo.am

Key Findings

We analyzed Indigo.am page load time and found that the first response time was 320 ms and then it took 12.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

indigo.am performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,840 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.045

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

indigo.am

320 ms

indigobrandingagency.com

745 ms

language-selector.css

329 ms

styles.css

344 ms

rgs.css

345 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Indigo.am, 98% (79 requests) were made to Indigobrandingagency.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7 sec) relates to the external source Indigobrandingagency.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 256.7 kB (4%)

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

6.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Indigo.am main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 64.9 kB

  • Original 77.1 kB
  • After minification 71.4 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 187.0 kB

  • Original 6.2 MB
  • After minification 6.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Indigo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 136.8 kB
  • After minification 136.8 kB
  • After compression 135.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 114.7 kB
  • After minification 114.7 kB
  • After compression 111.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indigo.am has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (42%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

42

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indigo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

indigo.am

indigo.am

320 ms

indigobrandingagency.com

indigobrandingagency.com

745 ms

language-selector.css

language-selector.css

329 ms

styles.css

styles.css

344 ms

rgs.css

rgs.css

345 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

355 ms

style.css

style.css

362 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

659 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1328 ms

nectar-slider.css

nectar-slider.css

2330 ms

portfolio.css

portfolio.css

2326 ms

dynamic-combined.css

dynamic-combined.css

2494 ms

ascend.css

ascend.css

3343 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

3348 ms

css

css

33 ms

Logo-RGB-Black-03.png

Logo-RGB-Black-03.png

3428 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

2326 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

4334 ms

priority.js

priority.js

3337 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

4336 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

4332 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

4350 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

4438 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

4340 ms

init.js

init.js

4677 ms

infinitescroll.js

infinitescroll.js

5049 ms

nectar-slider.js

nectar-slider.js

5330 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

5359 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

5348 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

5353 ms

sitepress.js

sitepress.js

5355 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

5376 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

5334 ms

Thumbnail.png

Thumbnail.png

6383 ms

Thumbnail.jpg

Thumbnail.jpg

6218 ms

Kamar-for-web-_Thumbnail-1.png

Kamar-for-web-_Thumbnail-1.png

6464 ms

chocoyan_Thumbnail.png

chocoyan_Thumbnail.png

6613 ms

Antari-portfolio-_Thumbnail.png

Antari-portfolio-_Thumbnail.png

6611 ms

Thumbnail.png

Thumbnail.png

5722 ms

Toon_Armeni_Portfolio_Indigo-Thumbnail.png

Toon_Armeni_Portfolio_Indigo-Thumbnail.png

6775 ms

Bacon_Portfolio_Indigo-Thumbnail.png

Bacon_Portfolio_Indigo-Thumbnail.png

6965 ms

Partners_logo_Armenia-Wine-1.png

Partners_logo_Armenia-Wine-1.png

6398 ms

Partners_logo_Digitain.png

Partners_logo_Digitain.png

6458 ms

Partners_logo_avanta.png

Partners_logo_avanta.png

6562 ms

Partners_logo_evocabank.png

Partners_logo_evocabank.png

6306 ms

Partners_logo_centralbank.png

Partners_logo_centralbank.png

5752 ms

Partners_logo_inecobank.png

Partners_logo_inecobank.png

4826 ms

Partners_logo_proshyan.png

Partners_logo_proshyan.png

4960 ms

Partners_logo_malocco.png

Partners_logo_malocco.png

4968 ms

Partners_logo_skill.png

Partners_logo_skill.png

4923 ms

Partners_logo_ameria.png

Partners_logo_ameria.png

4109 ms

Partners_logo_vallex.png

Partners_logo_vallex.png

4147 ms

Partners_logo-profilegroup.png

Partners_logo-profilegroup.png

4205 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

4292 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

3474 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

4069 ms

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

4270 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

4594 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

4209 ms

Partners_logo_vallex_telcell.png

Partners_logo_vallex_telcell.png

4140 ms

Partners_logo_solaron.png

Partners_logo_solaron.png

3901 ms

Partners_logo_vallex_CQ.png

Partners_logo_vallex_CQ.png

4378 ms

Partners_logo_Rooby.png

Partners_logo_Rooby.png

4097 ms

Partners_logo_republica.png

Partners_logo_republica.png

4087 ms

Partners_logo_cognaize.png

Partners_logo_cognaize.png

4085 ms

dynamic-combined.css

dynamic-combined.css

4157 ms

Indigo-Branding-Vogis-Gin-Award-Web-Banner.jpg

Indigo-Branding-Vogis-Gin-Award-Web-Banner.jpg

4516 ms

Opera_Portfolio_Indigo_Slider.jpeg

Opera_Portfolio_Indigo_Slider.jpeg

4696 ms

banner-05.png

banner-05.png

4992 ms

banner-06-3.png

banner-06-3.png

4038 ms

banner-04-04.png

banner-04-04.png

3550 ms

Futuris-Vector-2-300x300.jpg

Futuris-Vector-2-300x300.jpg

3497 ms

Famille-Group-InOne-2-300x300.jpg

Famille-Group-InOne-2-300x300.jpg

3799 ms

Galaxy-Group-300x300.png

Galaxy-Group-300x300.png

3913 ms

Dargett-300x300.png

Dargett-300x300.png

3801 ms

Logo-300x300.jpg

Logo-300x300.jpg

3697 ms

%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%B7-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F-1-300x300.png

%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%B7-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F-1-300x300.png

3739 ms

proshynarew-300x300.png

proshynarew-300x300.png

3652 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1733 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

336 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

459 ms

Accessibility Review

indigo.am accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

indigo.am best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

indigo.am SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indigo.am can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indigo.am main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

indigo.am

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Indigo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: