Tools & Wizards About Us
indigo2002.ifolder.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

indigo2002.ifolder.ru

Справочник организаций города Москвы (Россия) - Отзывы.com

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

136 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

219 ms

indigo2002.ifolder.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Indigo 2002 Ifolder content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about indigo2002.ifolder.ru

Полная актуальная информация о компаниях и учреждениях в Москве, городах России и СНГ. Самое подробное описание организаций, отзывы в интернете, адреса официальных сайтов, схемы проезда, телефоны бесп...

Visit indigo2002.ifolder.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Indigo2002.ifolder.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

indigo2002.ifolder.ru performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

indigo2002.ifolder.ru

136 ms

www.otzywy.com

489 ms

app.css

98 ms

context.js

972 ms

share.js

516 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Indigo2002.ifolder.ru, 76% (45 requests) were made to Otzywy.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Ads.betweendigital.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (972 ms) relates to the external source Yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 109.1 kB (39%)

Content Size

283.2 kB

After Optimization

174.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Indigo2002.ifolder.ru main page is 283.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 123.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 106.5 kB

  • Original 123.7 kB
  • After minification 90.8 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.8 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 86 B

  • Original 62.1 kB
  • After minification 62.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Indigo 2002 Ifolder images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 178 B

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 86.3 kB
  • After compression 86.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 11.1 kB
  • After minification 11.1 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indigo2002.ifolder.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (33%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indigo 2002 Ifolder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

indigo2002.ifolder.ru

indigo2002.ifolder.ru

136 ms

www.otzywy.com

www.otzywy.com

489 ms

app.css

app.css

98 ms

context.js

context.js

972 ms

share.js

share.js

516 ms

manifest.js

manifest.js

200 ms

vendor.js

vendor.js

392 ms

app.js

app.js

390 ms

code.js

code.js

528 ms

hit

hit

521 ms

bg-logo.png

bg-logo.png

278 ms

ico-search.png

ico-search.png

278 ms

ico-home.png

ico-home.png

370 ms

ico-cafe.png

ico-cafe.png

371 ms

ico-bar.png

ico-bar.png

370 ms

ico-hotel.png

ico-hotel.png

371 ms

ico-credit.png

ico-credit.png

379 ms

ico-taxi_002.png

ico-taxi_002.png

387 ms

ico-auto.png

ico-auto.png

461 ms

ico-cloth.png

ico-cloth.png

462 ms

ico-pet.png

ico-pet.png

462 ms

ico-build.png

ico-build.png

463 ms

ico-people.png

ico-people.png

470 ms

ico-notebook.png

ico-notebook.png

478 ms

ico-medic.png

ico-medic.png

553 ms

ico-lamp.png

ico-lamp.png

553 ms

ico-world.png

ico-world.png

554 ms

ico-house.png

ico-house.png

556 ms

ico-chair.png

ico-chair.png

562 ms

ico-chemistry.png

ico-chemistry.png

570 ms

ico-box.png

ico-box.png

646 ms

ico-bouling.png

ico-bouling.png

646 ms

ico-apple.png

ico-apple.png

646 ms

ico-tech.png

ico-tech.png

648 ms

ico-sport.png

ico-sport.png

654 ms

ico-security.png

ico-security.png

661 ms

ico-bag.png

ico-bag.png

739 ms

ico-art.png

ico-art.png

737 ms

ico-market.png

ico-market.png

738 ms

ico-pen.png

ico-pen.png

741 ms

ico-taxi.png

ico-taxi.png

745 ms

ico-study.png

ico-study.png

752 ms

ico-sos.png

ico-sos.png

830 ms

sspmatch-js

sspmatch-js

5 ms

73 ms

sync

sync

21 ms

ico-tv.png

ico-tv.png

747 ms

ico-lawyer.png

ico-lawyer.png

557 ms

ico-play-green.png

ico-play-green.png

560 ms

ico-positive.png

ico-positive.png

562 ms

ico-negative.png

ico-negative.png

566 ms

www.otzywy.com

www.otzywy.com

670 ms

logo-truste.png

logo-truste.png

556 ms

tag.js

tag.js

580 ms

1

1

294 ms

match

match

5 ms

match

match

5 ms

match

match

5 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

584 ms

Accessibility Review

indigo2002.ifolder.ru accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

indigo2002.ifolder.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

indigo2002.ifolder.ru SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indigo2002.ifolder.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indigo2002.ifolder.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

indigo2002.ifolder.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Indigo 2002 Ifolder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: