Tools & Wizards About Us
indigoblue.biz screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

indigoblue.biz

INDIGO BLUE |

Page Load Speed

7.9 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

indigoblue.biz screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing INDIGO BLUE content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about indigoblue.biz

Indigo Blueは長崎で創業7年を迎えるセレクトショップです。

Visit indigoblue.biz

Key Findings

We analyzed Indigoblue.biz page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

indigoblue.biz performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

indigoblue.biz

1543 ms

analytics.js

23 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

502 ms

style.min.css

1180 ms

classic-themes.min.css

589 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Indigoblue.biz, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Indigoblue.biz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 486.8 kB (14%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Indigoblue.biz main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 41.3 kB

  • Original 50.6 kB
  • After minification 42.9 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 165.0 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INDIGO BLUE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 142.3 kB

  • Original 227.4 kB
  • After minification 220.7 kB
  • After compression 85.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 142.3 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 138.2 kB

  • Original 164.5 kB
  • After minification 161.1 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indigoblue.biz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 138.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (49%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INDIGO BLUE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

indigoblue.biz

indigoblue.biz

1543 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

502 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1180 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

589 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

js

js

62 ms

styles.css

styles.css

437 ms

css

css

32 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

35 ms

style.css

style.css

695 ms

css

css

21 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

605 ms

slimbox2.css

slimbox2.css

604 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1410 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

632 ms

slimbox2.js

slimbox2.js

806 ms

slimbox2_autoload.js

slimbox2_autoload.js

806 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

657 ms

ssba.js

ssba.js

697 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

1304 ms

global.js

global.js

838 ms

retina.js

retina.js

853 ms

slider-home.js

slider-home.js

870 ms

fbicon.png

fbicon.png

532 ms

instaicon.png

instaicon.png

597 ms

bg_i.png

bg_i.png

1042 ms

indigo_sitelogo.png

indigo_sitelogo.png

197 ms

in980x450.png

in980x450.png

1755 ms

indigo01.png

indigo01.png

1346 ms

008.png

008.png

2054 ms

dot.png

dot.png

202 ms

IMG_E6806-scaled-230x180.jpg

IMG_E6806-scaled-230x180.jpg

588 ms

IMG_E6768-scaled-230x180.jpg

IMG_E6768-scaled-230x180.jpg

604 ms

IMG_E6719-scaled-230x180.jpg

IMG_E6719-scaled-230x180.jpg

980 ms

IMG_E6695-scaled-230x180.jpg

IMG_E6695-scaled-230x180.jpg

806 ms

IMG_E6679-scaled-230x180.jpg

IMG_E6679-scaled-230x180.jpg

1009 ms

IMG_E6623-scaled-230x180.jpg

IMG_E6623-scaled-230x180.jpg

1372 ms

IMG_E6553-scaled-230x180.jpg

IMG_E6553-scaled-230x180.jpg

1210 ms

IMG_E6552-scaled-230x180.jpg

IMG_E6552-scaled-230x180.jpg

1215 ms

calendar.png

calendar.png

1412 ms

tibetanlogo.png

tibetanlogo.png

168 ms

2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0j.ttf

2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0j.ttf

8 ms

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgzaGW8.ttf

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgzaGW8.ttf

26 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

175 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

14 ms

Accessibility Review

indigoblue.biz accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

indigoblue.biz best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

indigoblue.biz SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indigoblue.biz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indigoblue.biz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

indigoblue.biz

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of INDIGO BLUE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: