Tools & Wizards About Us
indigocomms.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

indigocomms.co.uk

Robot Challenge Screen

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

230 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

456 ms

indigocomms.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit indigocomms.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Indigocomms content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about indigocomms.co.uk

Your Business Can Achieve More With Indigo Introducing Indigo: Your Ultimate IT Partner. Experience enhanced efficiency, productivity, and success with us. We empower your team, streamline operations,...

Visit indigocomms.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Indigocomms.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

indigocomms.co.uk performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

indigocomms.co.uk

230 ms

indigocomms.co.uk

482 ms

css

41 ms

style.min.css

81 ms

theme.min.css

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Indigocomms.co.uk, 20% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Online.ibillie.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (685 ms) belongs to the original domain Indigocomms.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 152.0 kB (26%)

Content Size

588.6 kB

After Optimization

436.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Indigocomms.co.uk main page is 588.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 204.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 109.9 kB

  • Original 134.0 kB
  • After minification 129.3 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 25 B

  • Original 164.1 kB
  • After minification 164.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Indigocomms images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 17.4 kB

  • Original 204.3 kB
  • After minification 204.3 kB
  • After compression 186.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 81.6 kB
  • After compression 61.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indigocomms.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (70%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indigocomms. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

indigocomms.co.uk

indigocomms.co.uk

230 ms

indigocomms.co.uk

indigocomms.co.uk

482 ms

css

css

41 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

81 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

160 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

230 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

232 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

234 ms

e-animation-float.min.css

e-animation-float.min.css

236 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

235 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

236 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

305 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

310 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

312 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

312 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

314 ms

widget-form.min.css

widget-form.min.css

313 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

380 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

385 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

389 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

390 ms

post-127.css

post-127.css

392 ms

popup.min.css

popup.min.css

393 ms

fadeInDown.min.css

fadeInDown.min.css

457 ms

widget-animated-headline.min.css

widget-animated-headline.min.css

461 ms

widget-lottie.min.css

widget-lottie.min.css

465 ms

widget-counter.min.css

widget-counter.min.css

466 ms

fadeInUp.min.css

fadeInUp.min.css

468 ms

widget-image-carousel.min.css

widget-image-carousel.min.css

470 ms

widget-toggle.min.css

widget-toggle.min.css

532 ms

widget-image-box.min.css

widget-image-box.min.css

537 ms

widget-testimonial.min.css

widget-testimonial.min.css

542 ms

post-91.css

post-91.css

545 ms

post-698.css

post-698.css

547 ms

post-45.css

post-45.css

547 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

685 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

612 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

619 ms

js

js

82 ms

post-23.css

post-23.css

618 ms

motion-fx.min.css

motion-fx.min.css

549 ms

sticky.min.css

sticky.min.css

471 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

545 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

470 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

472 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

472 ms

lottie.min.js

lottie.min.js

647 ms

jquery-numerator.min.js

jquery-numerator.min.js

531 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

570 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

564 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

563 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

567 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

567 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

567 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

501 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

495 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

554 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

563 ms

Login.aspx

Login.aspx

456 ms

Indigo-Fallbackimg.webp

Indigo-Fallbackimg.webp

206 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

30 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

39 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

39 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

38 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

40 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

40 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

40 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

41 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

41 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

232 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

40 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

60 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

59 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

41 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

60 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

60 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

70 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

69 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

71 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

72 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

71 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

71 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

72 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

72 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

73 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

162 ms

Indigo-logo-copy-white-2-copy.webp

Indigo-logo-copy-white-2-copy.webp

79 ms

datto-white-1.jpg

datto-white-1.jpg

80 ms

microsoft.png.jpg

microsoft.png.jpg

87 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

109 ms

8x8-white-1.jpg

8x8-white-1.jpg

151 ms

9-white-1.jpg

9-white-1.jpg

154 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

156 ms

01-1.jpg

01-1.jpg

236 ms

iphone-2.webp

iphone-2.webp

186 ms

VOIP-2.webp

VOIP-2.webp

214 ms

IT-team.webp

IT-team.webp

224 ms

smartphone-copy-1.webp

smartphone-copy-1.webp

230 ms

Connectivity-2.webp

Connectivity-2.webp

232 ms

logo-4.jpg

logo-4.jpg

264 ms

Falkirk_FC_logo-copy-1.jpg

Falkirk_FC_logo-copy-1.jpg

292 ms

swg3-logo.jpg

swg3-logo.jpg

302 ms

Indigo-logo-300.jpg

Indigo-logo-300.jpg

308 ms

embed

embed

203 ms

js

js

28 ms

search.js

search.js

4 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

14 ms

styles.css

styles.css

83 ms

CoreStyles.css

CoreStyles.css

164 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

251 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

330 ms

styles.css

styles.css

427 ms

corestyles.css

corestyles.css

672 ms

bgorig.gif

bgorig.gif

84 ms

mid.jpg

mid.jpg

91 ms

bot.gif

bot.gif

93 ms

topblank.gif

topblank.gif

82 ms

bgorig.gif

bgorig.gif

331 ms

topblank.gif

topblank.gif

341 ms

mid.jpg

mid.jpg

111 ms

bot.gif

bot.gif

113 ms

Accessibility Review

indigocomms.co.uk accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

indigocomms.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

indigocomms.co.uk SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indigocomms.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indigocomms.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

indigocomms.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Indigocomms. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: