Tools & Wizards About Us
indigofx.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

indigofx.com

Indigo FX - International Money Transfers Made Easy

Page Load Speed

16.8 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

15.7 sec

Page Rendered

846 ms

indigofx.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to indigofx.com homepage info - get ready to check Indigo FX best content right away, or after learning these important things about indigofx.com

Send your international payments to anywhere in the world with access to over 60 currencies. Get in touch today: info@indigofx.co.uk.

Visit indigofx.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Indigofx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 16.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

indigofx.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value51.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value76.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value75.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value77,230 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.222

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value144.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

indigofx.com

199 ms

843 ms

indigofx.com

3825 ms

style.min.css

458 ms

custom-color-overrides.css

237 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Indigofx.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Services.postcodeanywhere.co.uk and 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Indigofx.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19.3 MB (94%)

Content Size

20.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Indigofx.com main page is 20.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 17.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-99%

Potential reduce by 17.4 MB

  • Original 17.5 MB
  • After minification 17.0 MB
  • After compression 182.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.4 MB or 99% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB
  • After compression 870.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 774.8 kB

  • Original 887.8 kB
  • After minification 802.9 kB
  • After compression 113.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indigofx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 774.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (92%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indigo FX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

indigofx.com

indigofx.com

199 ms

843 ms

indigofx.com

indigofx.com

3825 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

458 ms

custom-color-overrides.css

custom-color-overrides.css

237 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

cleantalk-public.min.css

237 ms

styles.css

styles.css

238 ms

style.css

style.css

591 ms

style.basic.css

style.basic.css

396 ms

style-simple-grey.css

style-simple-grey.css

320 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

320 ms

gdpr-main.css

gdpr-main.css

556 ms

page.js

page.js

140 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

569 ms

addtoany.min.js

addtoany.min.js

481 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

618 ms

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

23 ms

primary-navigation.js

primary-navigation.js

569 ms

css

css

35 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

647 ms

bootstrap-utilities.min.css

bootstrap-utilities.min.css

569 ms

slick.css

slick.css

585 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

602 ms

styles.css

styles.css

704 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

732 ms

js

js

65 ms

address-3.91.css

address-3.91.css

82 ms

address-3.91.js

address-3.91.js

65 ms

polyfills.js

polyfills.js

111 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

35 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

424 ms

sensor.js

sensor.js

900 ms

Quicksand-Regular.woff

Quicksand-Regular.woff

377 ms

Quicksand-Medium.woff

Quicksand-Medium.woff

375 ms

Quicksand-SemiBold.woff

Quicksand-SemiBold.woff

375 ms

Quicksand-Bold.woff

Quicksand-Bold.woff

376 ms

BaiJamjuree-Bold.woff

BaiJamjuree-Bold.woff

606 ms

BaiJamjuree-Medium.woff

BaiJamjuree-Medium.woff

375 ms

BaiJamjuree-Regular.woff

BaiJamjuree-Regular.woff

606 ms

jquery-3.5.1.js

jquery-3.5.1.js

428 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

426 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

428 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

426 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

430 ms

general.js

general.js

429 ms

widget.js

widget.js

428 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

430 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

428 ms

index.js

index.js

428 ms

index.js

index.js

544 ms

script.js

script.js

544 ms

responsive-embeds.js

responsive-embeds.js

545 ms

asl-prereq.js

asl-prereq.js

545 ms

asl-core.js

asl-core.js

545 ms

asl-results-vertical.js

asl-results-vertical.js

545 ms

asl-autocomplete.js

asl-autocomplete.js

545 ms

asl-load.js

asl-load.js

636 ms

asl-wrapper.js

asl-wrapper.js

637 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

637 ms

main.js

main.js

637 ms

wpcf7-recaptcha-controls.js

wpcf7-recaptcha-controls.js

637 ms

api.js

api.js

425 ms

forms.js

forms.js

637 ms

print.css

print.css

336 ms

recaptcha__en_gb.js

recaptcha__en_gb.js

6057 ms

sm.25.html

sm.25.html

6053 ms

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

6683 ms

platformemailvalidation-1.40.min.css

platformemailvalidation-1.40.min.css

6043 ms

platformemailvalidation-1.40.min.js

platformemailvalidation-1.40.min.js

6043 ms

platformcaptureplus-2.34.min.css

platformcaptureplus-2.34.min.css

6674 ms

platformcaptureplus-2.34.min.js

platformcaptureplus-2.34.min.js

7017 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

7571 ms

BusinessHomepage_TopBannerImage_735x612V2.svg

BusinessHomepage_TopBannerImage_735x612V2.svg

8245 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

6897 ms

Accessibility Review

indigofx.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

SEO Factors

indigofx.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indigofx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indigofx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

indigofx.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Indigo FX. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: