Tools & Wizards About Us
indigosparks.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

indigosparks.com

Indigo Sparks Inc | Promotional Products Supplier | Diamond Bar, CA: Home

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

593 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

322 ms

indigosparks.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Indigo Sparks content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about indigosparks.com

Indigo Sparks Inc. Best selection of promotional products including bags, drinkware, keychains and much more!

Visit indigosparks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Indigosparks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 593 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

indigosparks.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.336

33/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.indigosparks.com

593 ms

api.js

43 ms

bootstrap.min.css

37 ms

css

32 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

102 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Indigosparks.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (894 ms) belongs to the original domain Indigosparks.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 187.7 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Indigosparks.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 48.0 kB

  • Original 58.2 kB
  • After minification 51.6 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 24.9 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 985.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Indigo Sparks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 53.0 kB

  • Original 465.6 kB
  • After minification 465.1 kB
  • After compression 412.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.0 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 61.8 kB

  • Original 217.8 kB
  • After minification 217.8 kB
  • After compression 156.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indigosparks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (46%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indigo Sparks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.indigosparks.com

www.indigosparks.com

593 ms

api.js

api.js

43 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

37 ms

css

css

32 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

102 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

108 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

225 ms

slick.css

slick.css

145 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

150 ms

yamm.css

yamm.css

152 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

153 ms

StyleSheet

StyleSheet

268 ms

header-image-copy.png

header-image-copy.png

282 ms

Pic

Pic

189 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

240 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

239 ms

migrate-3.1.0.js

migrate-3.1.0.js

238 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

268 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

260 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

261 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

273 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

377 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

378 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

405 ms

iframeResizer.min.js

iframeResizer.min.js

405 ms

IFrameUtils.js

IFrameUtils.js

406 ms

jquery.backstretch.min.js

jquery.backstretch.min.js

412 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

412 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

415 ms

datepicker-fr-ca.js

datepicker-fr-ca.js

414 ms

custom.js

custom.js

413 ms

highslide-full.packed.js

highslide-full.packed.js

416 ms

highslide.config.js

highslide.config.js

442 ms

highslide.css

highslide.css

448 ms

Pic

Pic

522 ms

Pic

Pic

520 ms

QPic

QPic

459 ms

QPic

QPic

460 ms

QPic

QPic

497 ms

QPic

QPic

468 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

21 ms

QPic

QPic

415 ms

QPic

QPic

412 ms

QPic

QPic

407 ms

QPic

QPic

419 ms

QPic

QPic

420 ms

QPic

QPic

421 ms

QPic

QPic

402 ms

QPic

QPic

340 ms

QPic

QPic

356 ms

QPic

QPic

376 ms

QPic

QPic

377 ms

QPic

QPic

358 ms

QPic

QPic

372 ms

css

css

16 ms

QPic

QPic

376 ms

QPic

QPic

379 ms

QPic

QPic

398 ms

QPic

QPic

384 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

124 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

124 ms

QPic

QPic

272 ms

QPic

QPic

339 ms

QPic

QPic

344 ms

QPic

QPic

335 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

450 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

482 ms

fa-thin-100.ttf

fa-thin-100.ttf

524 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

549 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

894 ms

close.png

close.png

367 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

405 ms

prev.png

prev.png

425 ms

next.png

next.png

430 ms

custom.png

custom.png

37 ms

zoomout.cur

zoomout.cur

39 ms

loader.white.gif

loader.white.gif

37 ms

flexslider-icon.woff

flexslider-icon.woff

38 ms

Accessibility Review

indigosparks.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

indigosparks.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

indigosparks.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indigosparks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indigosparks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

indigosparks.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Indigo Sparks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: