6.1 sec in total
347 ms
5.3 sec
375 ms
Click here to check amazing Infiniteloop content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about infiniteloop.no
Reaching the goals, seeing the results, doing it together
Visit infiniteloop.noWe analyzed Infiniteloop.no page load time and found that the first response time was 347 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
infiniteloop.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value680 ms
44/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
347 ms
294 ms
859 ms
61 ms
390 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Infiniteloop.no, 92% (71 requests) were made to Kickback.no and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Kickback.no.
Page size can be reduced by 377.6 kB (41%)
921.9 kB
544.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Infiniteloop.no main page is 921.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 526.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.2 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Infiniteloop needs image optimization as it can save up to 67.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 70.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 171.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infiniteloop.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 171.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (14%)
73
63
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infiniteloop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
infiniteloop.no
347 ms
kickback.no
294 ms
kickback.no
859 ms
css
61 ms
css_c89610eecfe9503d1db622d3f354ab6e.css
390 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
drupal.js
305 ms
nb_e93eca679aea73ec86f516569eb30f5c.js
305 ms
jquery.cookie.js
321 ms
kb_produculus.js
324 ms
bootstrap.min.js
413 ms
offcanvas.js
602 ms
wow.min.js
606 ms
scripts.dev.js
609 ms
dirty.css
627 ms
analytics.js
67 ms
cdon_greenplate_webb.gif
191 ms
ellos-logo-2014.png
137 ms
DustinHome-logo_alt2_bl%C3%A5-svart_254.jpg
313 ms
inkClub-logo.png
315 ms
handysize-logo.png
317 ms
tretti.no_.png
318 ms
zalando-logo.jpeg
421 ms
voga-logo2.png
585 ms
nike-logo.png
614 ms
lekmer-200_0.png
629 ms
logo-nelly-2015.png
631 ms
mimmis-logo_0.png
638 ms
hotelscom-logo_0.png
723 ms
expedia-logo_0.gif
906 ms
booking-logo.png
915 ms
solfaktorlogo_liggende_rgb.png
930 ms
zleepinghotels-logo.png
933 ms
bokkilden_200px.gif
960 ms
letsdeal-logo-2014_0.png
1024 ms
logo-adlibris-2014.png
1189 ms
tanum-no_header-logo_trans.png
1234 ms
logo-coverbrands-2014.png
1245 ms
Vita_logo.png
1248 ms
feelunique-logo_1.png
1262 ms
proteinfabrikken-logoer.jpg
1326 ms
image.htm_.png
1507 ms
lookfantastic-logo_0.png
1528 ms
haugenbok.png
1554 ms
sigve.jpg
1663 ms
thilip.jpg
1785 ms
anette.jpg
1708 ms
logo-white.min.svg
1793 ms
bg-noise.png
1815 ms
cache
1864 ms
cache
1930 ms
bestseller-logo.png
2059 ms
collect
25 ms
sdk.js
24 ms
kbicons.woff
2156 ms
eleven-no-logo_0.png
1911 ms
smg_80x26.png
1825 ms
e24_133x67.png
1856 ms
aft_97x33.png
1936 ms
vg_70x26.png
2068 ms
finn_82x26.png
2007 ms
cache
1851 ms
cache
1845 ms
cache
1911 ms
cache
1976 ms
cache
2055 ms
cache
1990 ms
paypal-bestseller.png
1933 ms
lookfantastic-sol.jpg
1944 ms
eleven-rabatt.jpg
2079 ms
vg.png
1977 ms
dinepenger.png
2039 ms
kk.png
1977 ms
dinside.png
1953 ms
online.png
1925 ms
fb.png
1965 ms
abc.png
2056 ms
infiniteloop.no accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
infiniteloop.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
infiniteloop.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infiniteloop.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Infiniteloop.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infiniteloop.no
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Infiniteloop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: