Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

infiniteloop.no

Kickback

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

347 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

375 ms

infiniteloop.no screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Infiniteloop content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about infiniteloop.no

Reaching the goals, seeing the results, doing it together

Visit infiniteloop.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Infiniteloop.no page load time and found that the first response time was 347 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

infiniteloop.no performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value680 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

infiniteloop.no

347 ms

kickback.no

294 ms

kickback.no

859 ms

css

61 ms

css_c89610eecfe9503d1db622d3f354ab6e.css

390 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Infiniteloop.no, 92% (71 requests) were made to Kickback.no and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Kickback.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 377.6 kB (41%)

Content Size

921.9 kB

After Optimization

544.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Infiniteloop.no main page is 921.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 526.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 67.7 kB

  • Original 80.4 kB
  • After minification 61.3 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.2 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 67.8 kB

  • Original 526.6 kB
  • After minification 458.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Infiniteloop needs image optimization as it can save up to 67.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 70.4 kB

  • Original 112.4 kB
  • After minification 89.9 kB
  • After compression 42.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 171.8 kB

  • Original 202.5 kB
  • After minification 201.3 kB
  • After compression 30.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infiniteloop.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 171.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (14%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

63

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infiniteloop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

infiniteloop.no accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

infiniteloop.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

infiniteloop.no SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infiniteloop.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Infiniteloop.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Infiniteloop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: