6.6 sec in total
813 ms
5.1 sec
640 ms
Visit influence.digital now to see the best up-to-date Influence content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about influence.digital
Influence Digital is nominated for Best Social Media Campaign 2022 by Marketing Week. Performance / Creative / Strategy : We Make A Difference
Visit influence.digitalWe analyzed Influence.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 813 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
influence.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value12.3 s
0/100
25%
Value11.9 s
4/100
10%
Value1,340 ms
17/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
813 ms
334 ms
327 ms
337 ms
324 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Influence.digital, 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Influence.digital.
Page size can be reduced by 139.8 kB (18%)
787.9 kB
648.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Influence.digital main page is 787.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 332.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 118.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Influence images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Influence.digital has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (81%)
80
15
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Influence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
influence.digital
813 ms
style.min.css
334 ms
animate.css
327 ms
lvca-frontend.css
337 ms
icomoon.css
324 ms
custom-style.css
325 ms
bootstrap.min.css
507 ms
style.css
643 ms
slick.css
641 ms
style.css
642 ms
style.css
644 ms
style.css
657 ms
style.css
823 ms
style.css
955 ms
style.css
956 ms
style.css
957 ms
style.css
959 ms
style.css
972 ms
style.css
1152 ms
style.css
1271 ms
style.css
1266 ms
flexslider.css
1276 ms
style.css
1279 ms
style.css
1290 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1469 ms
app.css
1589 ms
style.css
1501 ms
css
47 ms
js_composer.min.css
1522 ms
jquery.min.js
1536 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1215 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
1538 ms
lvca-frontend.min.js
1696 ms
jquery.min.js
2156 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1820 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1839 ms
additional-methods.js
1844 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
43 ms
js
75 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
53 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
14 ms
brands.min.js
24 ms
custom.js
1759 ms
accordion.min.js
1777 ms
slick.min.js
1905 ms
jquery.stats.min.js
1919 ms
odometer.min.js
1918 ms
piechart.min.js
1937 ms
posts-carousel.min.js
1902 ms
spacer.min.js
1704 ms
services.min.js
1919 ms
stats-bar.min.js
1939 ms
tabs.min.js
1932 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
1941 ms
testimonials.min.js
1634 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1780 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1824 ms
portfolio.min.js
1924 ms
custom-appv3.js
1931 ms
scrollingelement.js
1926 ms
vendor.min.js
1784 ms
underscore.min.js
1783 ms
app.min.js
1827 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1925 ms
style.css
1618 ms
analytics.js
255 ms
uwt.js
255 ms
fbevents.js
153 ms
black.png
451 ms
white.png
451 ms
getintouch_black.png
451 ms
getintouch_white.png
451 ms
Stickers-and-drawings-20x12.webp
450 ms
Screenshot-2024-09-03-at-10.10.57-20x12.png
450 ms
credit-variety-20x12.jpg
750 ms
emily-in-paris-season-4-release-date-production-cast-trailer-more-all-you-need-to-know-about-lily-collins-netflix-series-20x12.jpg
757 ms
info_at.jpg
755 ms
wlpigxjLBV1hqnzfr-F8sEYMB0Yybp0mudRfw6-_B2sg.ttf
243 ms
wlpigxjLBV1hqnzfr-F8sEYMB0Yybp0mudRf36y_B2sg.ttf
361 ms
wlpigxjLBV1hqnzfr-F8sEYMB0Yybp0mudRf-62_B2sg.ttf
394 ms
wlpigxjLBV1hqnzfr-F8sEYMB0Yybp0mudRfp66_B2sg.ttf
393 ms
wlpigxjLBV1hqnzfr-F8sEYMB0Yybp0mudRfi6m_B2sg.ttf
394 ms
wlpvgxjLBV1hqnzfr-F8sEYMB0Yybp0mudRXeIqv.ttf
438 ms
wlpigxjLBV1hqnzfr-F8sEYMB0Yybp0mudRf06i_B2sg.ttf
439 ms
wlpigxjLBV1hqnzfr-F8sEYMB0Yybp0mudRft6u_B2sg.ttf
437 ms
wlphgxjLBV1hqnzfr-F8sEYMB0Yybp0mudRfG7qoIEs.ttf
479 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
516 ms
collect
145 ms
poster3.png
337 ms
main.js
45 ms
adsct
88 ms
adsct
193 ms
influence.digital accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
influence.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
influence.digital SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Influence.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Influence.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
influence.digital
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Influence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: