Tools & Wizards About Us
influxwebtechnologies.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

influxwebtechnologies.net

Influxweb Technologies- cung cấp dịch vụ Website và Digital Marketing

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

700 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

199 ms

influxwebtechnologies.net screenshot

About Website

Visit influxwebtechnologies.net now to see the best up-to-date Influxweb Technologies content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about influxwebtechnologies.net

Influxweb Technologies với nhiều năm kinh nghiệm trong lĩnh vực thiết kế Website và Digital Marketing sẵn sàng tư vấn và triển khai dự án cho khách hàng

Visit influxwebtechnologies.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Influxwebtechnologies.net page load time and found that the first response time was 700 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

influxwebtechnologies.net performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.557

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

influxwebtechnologies.net

700 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

285 ms

style.min.css

277 ms

styles.css

286 ms

style.min.css

289 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Influxwebtechnologies.net, 17% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (700 ms) belongs to the original domain Influxwebtechnologies.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.5 kB (35%)

Content Size

400.8 kB

After Optimization

261.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Influxwebtechnologies.net main page is 400.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 201.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 44.6 kB
  • After minification 40.7 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 80.2 kB

  • Original 201.6 kB
  • After minification 121.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Influxweb Technologies needs image optimization as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 20.3 kB

  • Original 95.9 kB
  • After minification 95.9 kB
  • After compression 75.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.3 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 58.7 kB
  • After minification 58.7 kB
  • After compression 54.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Influxwebtechnologies.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (67%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Influxweb Technologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

influxwebtechnologies.net

influxwebtechnologies.net

700 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

285 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

277 ms

styles.css

styles.css

286 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

289 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

38 ms

css

css

28 ms

animate.css

animate.css

279 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

48 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

58 ms

style.css

style.css

70 ms

easy-social-share-buttons.css

easy-social-share-buttons.css

91 ms

styles.css

styles.css

101 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

112 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

123 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

8 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

131 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

144 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

154 ms

jquery.superfish.js

jquery.superfish.js

165 ms

draggabilly.pkgd.min.js

draggabilly.pkgd.min.js

176 ms

elastiStack.js

elastiStack.js

188 ms

square-custom.js

square-custom.js

445 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

536 ms

embed

embed

222 ms

logo-influxweb-main-2.png

logo-influxweb-main-2.png

499 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

369 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

507 ms

banner-shadow.png

banner-shadow.png

287 ms

featured-bg.png

featured-bg.png

286 ms

about-us-section.jpg

about-us-section.jpg

388 ms

logo-influxweb-footer-300x60.png

logo-influxweb-footer-300x60.png

159 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

32 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

31 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

33 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

32 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

636 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBA5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBA5Xk.ttf

32 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBA5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBA5Xk.ttf

33 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBA5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBA5Xk.ttf

33 ms

js

js

108 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

283 ms

Accessibility Review

influxwebtechnologies.net accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

influxwebtechnologies.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

influxwebtechnologies.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    VI

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Influxwebtechnologies.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Vietnamese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Influxwebtechnologies.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

influxwebtechnologies.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Influxweb Technologies. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: