7.8 sec in total
1.5 sec
5.4 sec
878 ms
Visit infobip.com now to see the best up-to-date Infobip content for Tanzania and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about infobip.com
Engage your customers and prospects with simple drag and drop email, SMS, chatbot or build custom solutions with the best in class APIs
Visit infobip.comWe analyzed Infobip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
infobip.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value2,820 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.4 s
1/100
10%
1460 ms
663 ms
227 ms
735 ms
333 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Infobip.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Secure.livechatinc.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Infobip.com.
Page size can be reduced by 607.1 kB (34%)
1.8 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Infobip.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 903.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 573 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Infobip images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 545.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 545.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (52%)
83
40
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infobip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.infobip.com
1460 ms
75677482e2830261a2b0e829e7b35a5159cdbf59.1456744509.css
663 ms
modernizr.min.js
227 ms
300696ec57aba59be24d60b3c3093da50b015071.1456744539.js
735 ms
165ad3d981c1c9cee0cbc1410a73280190b416f9.1456751218.js
333 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
4 ms
infobip-logo-white.svg
244 ms
hero-bg.jpg
682 ms
bracket-tl-14.svg
246 ms
bracket-bl-14.svg
246 ms
bracket-tr-14.svg
258 ms
bracket-br-14.svg
331 ms
tri.png
466 ms
home-code.png
467 ms
platform-bg.jpg
857 ms
api.svg
613 ms
bracket-tc-14.svg
611 ms
diag-hash-light.png
691 ms
bracket-bc-14.svg
697 ms
database-integration.svg
895 ms
portal.svg
887 ms
global-stats-bg.jpg
1184 ms
bracket-tl-30.svg
911 ms
bracket-tr-30.svg
941 ms
bracket-br-30.svg
1088 ms
bracket-bl-30.svg
1110 ms
messaging_card.jpg
1203 ms
number_lookup_card.jpg
1220 ms
voice_card.jpg
1249 ms
viber.png
1326 ms
zendesk.png
1350 ms
vodafone.png
1409 ms
softbank.png
1436 ms
o2.png
1455 ms
uba.png
1476 ms
asseco.png
1554 ms
tlc.png
1581 ms
refunite.png
1653 ms
mambu.png
1664 ms
telenor.png
1688 ms
telus.png
1667 ms
gtm.js
94 ms
gtm.js
136 ms
tracking.js
92 ms
Proxima-Nova-Regular.woff
1749 ms
script_data.js
132 ms
analytics.js
42 ms
ts.js
313 ms
atrk.js
37 ms
Proxima-Nova-Bold.woff
1747 ms
Linearicons.woff
2031 ms
8562.js
25 ms
Proxima-Nova-Extrabold.woff
1818 ms
elasticio.png
1666 ms
s
64 ms
linkid.js
23 ms
atrk.gif
64 ms
u
55 ms
collect
42 ms
collect
51 ms
test.png
40 ms
ee.png
1602 ms
collect
58 ms
localization.en.0.3632191afe35222a6b78c04d457adc0d_1e2768916aaa8d2837e6be1fbb4931fb.js
65 ms
ping
101 ms
open_chat.cgi
86 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
80 ms
livechat-modern_7cf45543dc.ttf
34 ms
ga-audiences
41 ms
ga-audiences
34 ms
embedded.20160229123341.js
124 ms
interswitch.png
1690 ms
diag-hash-dark.png
1692 ms
tsr.js
110 ms
insight.min.js
68 ms
collect
64 ms
conversion.js
61 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
32 ms
bracket-tee.svg
1569 ms
events_card.jpg
1590 ms
49 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
35 ms
80 ms
mwc2016_ticket_winners_card.jpg
2150 ms
19 ms
infobip-logo.svg
1692 ms
30 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
30 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
57 ms
widgets.js
23 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
26 ms
like.php
98 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
16 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
270 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
305 ms
jot
84 ms
16 ms
infobip.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
infobip.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
infobip.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infobip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infobip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infobip.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Infobip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: