Tools & Wizards About Us
infocutter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

infocutter.com

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

696 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

517 ms

infocutter.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to infocutter.com homepage info - get ready to check Infocutter best content for Canada right away, or after learning these important things about infocutter.com

도메인, 도메인등록, 퀵돔등록, 도메인연장, 도메인이전, 무료 파킹, 무료포워딩 제공, 국내 최저가 도메인 서비스 제공, 웹호스팅, 서버호스팅, 홈페이지제작, 쇼핑몰, 서버, IDC

Visit infocutter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Infocutter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 696 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

infocutter.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.051

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

infocutter.com

696 ms

infocutter.com

1860 ms

style.min.css

386 ms

theme.min.css

608 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

662 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Infocutter.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Infocutter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 722.0 kB (30%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Infocutter.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 70.3 kB

  • Original 90.5 kB
  • After minification 88.0 kB
  • After compression 20.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 623.1 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Infocutter needs image optimization as it can save up to 623.1 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 28.3 kB

  • Original 139.6 kB
  • After minification 139.6 kB
  • After compression 111.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 321 B

  • Original 51.9 kB
  • After minification 51.9 kB
  • After compression 51.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infocutter.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (78%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infocutter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

infocutter.com

infocutter.com

696 ms

infocutter.com

infocutter.com

1860 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

386 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

608 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

662 ms

post-137.css

post-137.css

660 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

673 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

677 ms

global.css

global.css

692 ms

post-61.css

post-61.css

832 ms

post-28.css

post-28.css

877 ms

post-21.css

post-21.css

885 ms

css

css

51 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1142 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

901 ms

js

js

81 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

913 ms

widget-call-to-action.min.css

widget-call-to-action.min.css

1045 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

1086 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

1093 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

1116 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1185 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

1194 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

1195 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1194 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

1198 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1201 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1290 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1327 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1384 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1410 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1434 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1436 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1572 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

1582 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

1602 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

642 ms

Laptop2-e1702194325545.png

Laptop2-e1702194325545.png

1094 ms

Mobile-e1702194555133-1024x717.png

Mobile-e1702194555133-1024x717.png

834 ms

image.png

image.png

2593 ms

font

font

18 ms

font

font

28 ms

font

font

59 ms

font

font

60 ms

Accessibility Review

infocutter.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

infocutter.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

infocutter.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    KO

  • Language Claimed

    KO

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infocutter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Korean is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infocutter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

infocutter.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Infocutter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: