5.1 sec in total
373 ms
4.4 sec
349 ms
Visit infodynamic.net now to see the best up-to-date Infodynamic content for United Arab Emirates and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about infodynamic.net
Global Software Solution provider for Shipping & Logistics, Tours & Travel, Airlines, Retail, Warehouse & Distribution Industries.
Visit infodynamic.netWe analyzed Infodynamic.net page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
infodynamic.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value1,130 ms
23/100
30%
Value1.978
0/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
373 ms
754 ms
356 ms
1638 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Infodynamic.net, 83% (79 requests) were made to D1v8eniill6m9u.cloudfront.net and 4% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Infodynamic.net.
Page size can be reduced by 111.7 kB (34%)
333.5 kB
221.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Infodynamic.net main page is 333.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 125.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 35.9 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Infodynamic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 953 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infodynamic.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (19%)
80
65
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infodynamic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
infodynamic.net
373 ms
infodynamic.net
754 ms
www.infodynamic.net
356 ms
www.infodynamic.net
1638 ms
bootstrap.min.css
31 ms
idangerous.swiper.css
38 ms
style.css
44 ms
animate.css
40 ms
loader.css
41 ms
js_composer.min.css
51 ms
font-awesome.min.css
66 ms
all.css
50 ms
jquery-2.1.3.min.js
39 ms
js
84 ms
gtm.js
47 ms
logowb.webp
3 ms
logo.webp
27 ms
proximanova-regular-webfont.woff
802 ms
548 ms
InfoDynamicsOff
121 ms
logo.webp
5 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
20 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
31 ms
proximanova-extrabold-webfont.woff
776 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
40 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
795 ms
InfoDynamicsOff
125 ms
bg_img.webp
15 ms
slide-6.webp
18 ms
drag.png
18 ms
slide-1.webp
19 ms
slide-2.webp
19 ms
background-8.webp
19 ms
slide-5.webp
787 ms
oracle-service.png
513 ms
background-9.webp
22 ms
icon-1.webp
23 ms
icon-2.webp
799 ms
icon-3.webp
35 ms
icon-4.webp
37 ms
icon-5.webp
39 ms
logistics.webp
40 ms
flight.webp
43 ms
retail.webp
45 ms
transport.webp
49 ms
hrms.webp
51 ms
manufacture.webp
819 ms
icon-41.webp
561 ms
icon-42.webp
561 ms
proximanova-black-webfont.woff
1317 ms
icon-43.webp
1326 ms
icon-44.webp
565 ms
icon-45.webp
565 ms
icon-46.webp
565 ms
slide-6.webp
565 ms
icon-57.webp
582 ms
icon-58.webp
583 ms
icon-59.webp
583 ms
icon-60.webp
584 ms
client1.webp
1341 ms
client2.webp
1389 ms
client3.webp
640 ms
client4.png
641 ms
client5.webp
643 ms
client6.webp
639 ms
client7.webp
641 ms
client8.png
643 ms
client9.png
643 ms
client10.png
645 ms
client11.webp
647 ms
client12.png
649 ms
background-14.webp
651 ms
blk-bg.webp
665 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
18 ms
icon-21.png
488 ms
footer-certificate-image.jpg
491 ms
bootstrap.min.js
485 ms
idangerous.swiper.min.js
489 ms
global.js
273 ms
particles.js
271 ms
app.js
282 ms
wow.min.js
139 ms
slide-6.webp
24 ms
slide-1.webp
24 ms
slide-2.webp
24 ms
background-8.webp
25 ms
slide-5.webp
24 ms
background-9.webp
25 ms
background-14.webp
26 ms
slide-1.webp
5 ms
background-9.webp
3 ms
slide-6.webp
5 ms
slide-2.webp
5 ms
background-8.webp
2 ms
slide-5.webp
4 ms
infodynamic.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
infodynamic.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
infodynamic.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infodynamic.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infodynamic.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infodynamic.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Infodynamic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: