Tools & Wizards About Us
infolike.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

infolike.ru

Домен infolike.ru доступен для переоформления

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

616 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

127 ms

infolike.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to infolike.ru homepage info - get ready to check Infolike best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about infolike.ru

Домен продаётся

Visit infolike.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Infolike.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 616 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

infolike.ru performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

infolike.ru

616 ms

css

34 ms

open-iconic-bootstrap.min.css

153 ms

animate.css

609 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

308 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Infolike.ru, 22% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Infolike.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 455.1 kB (69%)

Content Size

663.3 kB

After Optimization

208.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Infolike.ru main page is 663.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 508.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 12.1 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 56.5 kB
  • After minification 55.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Infolike images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 85.3 kB
  • After minification 85.3 kB
  • After compression 85.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 445.0 kB

  • Original 508.3 kB
  • After minification 427.2 kB
  • After compression 63.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infolike.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 445.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (87%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infolike. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

infolike.ru

infolike.ru

616 ms

css

css

34 ms

open-iconic-bootstrap.min.css

open-iconic-bootstrap.min.css

153 ms

animate.css

animate.css

609 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

308 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

307 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

307 ms

aos.css

aos.css

466 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

629 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.css

bootstrap-datepicker.css

610 ms

jquery.timepicker.css

jquery.timepicker.css

459 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

461 ms

icomoon.css

icomoon.css

919 ms

style.css

style.css

1387 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1241 ms

jquery-migrate-3.0.1.min.js

jquery-migrate-3.0.1.min.js

760 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

763 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

785 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

909 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

914 ms

jquery.stellar.min.js

jquery.stellar.min.js

943 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1061 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1067 ms

aos.js

aos.js

1071 ms

jquery.animateNumber.min.js

jquery.animateNumber.min.js

1100 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.js

bootstrap-datepicker.js

1215 ms

jquery.timepicker.min.js

jquery.timepicker.min.js

1219 ms

scrollax.min.js

scrollax.min.js

1224 ms

main.js

main.js

1257 ms

sl.jpg

sl.jpg

1368 ms

1.png

1.png

1372 ms

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jow.ttf

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jow.ttf

31 ms

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBi8Jow.ttf

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBi8Jow.ttf

38 ms

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8Jow.ttf

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8Jow.ttf

47 ms

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nXBi8Jow.ttf

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nXBi8Jow.ttf

49 ms

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nWBi8Jow.ttf

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nWBi8Jow.ttf

72 ms

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBi8Jow.ttf

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBi8Jow.ttf

47 ms

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8Jow.ttf

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8Jow.ttf

47 ms

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8Jow.ttf

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8Jow.ttf

47 ms

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K-DQBi8Jow.ttf

QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K-DQBi8Jow.ttf

48 ms

tag.js

tag.js

899 ms

Accessibility Review

infolike.ru accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

infolike.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

infolike.ru SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infolike.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infolike.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

infolike.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Infolike. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: