Tools & Wizards About Us
informationshield.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

informationshield.com

Develop Information Security Policies Quickly - Information Shield

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

660 ms

informationshield.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to informationshield.com homepage info - get ready to check Information Shield best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about informationshield.com

Information Security Policies Made Easy from Information Shield. Streamline compliance with data protection laws IS0-27002, NIST-CSF, HIPAA, and more!

Visit informationshield.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Informationshield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

informationshield.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,850 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

informationshield.com

48 ms

informationshield.com

63 ms

stat.js

89 ms

index.css

20 ms

style-index.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Informationshield.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Js.authorize.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (475 ms) belongs to the original domain Informationshield.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 134.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Informationshield.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 114.1 kB

  • Original 144.6 kB
  • After minification 144.5 kB
  • After compression 30.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 803.0 kB
  • After minification 803.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Information Shield images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 1.1 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 141.5 kB
  • After minification 141.5 kB
  • After compression 138.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Informationshield.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 87 (85%)

Requests Now

102

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Information Shield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 78 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

informationshield.com

informationshield.com

48 ms

informationshield.com

informationshield.com

63 ms

stat.js

stat.js

89 ms

index.css

index.css

20 ms

style-index.css

style-index.css

85 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

99 ms

flatsome.css

flatsome.css

62 ms

flatsome-shop.css

flatsome-shop.css

82 ms

style.css

style.css

72 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

187 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

88 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

94 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

129 ms

w.js

w.js

83 ms

headerScript.min.js

headerScript.min.js

138 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

126 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

128 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

143 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

129 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

134 ms

woocommerce-add-to-cart.js

woocommerce-add-to-cart.js

181 ms

js

js

126 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

128 ms

player.js

player.js

123 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

153 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

145 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

307 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

308 ms

login.1712157296.css

login.1712157296.css

165 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

163 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

177 ms

dom.min.js

dom.min.js

176 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

309 ms

escape-html.min.js

escape-html.min.js

307 ms

element.min.js

element.min.js

369 ms

is-shallow-equal.min.js

is-shallow-equal.min.js

308 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

368 ms

keycodes.min.js

keycodes.min.js

369 ms

priority-queue.min.js

priority-queue.min.js

308 ms

compose.min.js

compose.min.js

310 ms

Accept.js

Accept.js

125 ms

21396566.js

21396566.js

131 ms

api.js

api.js

119 ms

private-apis.min.js

private-apis.min.js

308 ms

redux-routine.min.js

redux-routine.min.js

357 ms

data.min.js

data.min.js

305 ms

wc-blocks-registry.js

wc-blocks-registry.js

304 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

325 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

314 ms

wc-settings.js

wc-settings.js

312 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

313 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

302 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

276 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

277 ms

data-controls.min.js

data-controls.min.js

299 ms

html-entities.min.js

html-entities.min.js

273 ms

notices.min.js

notices.min.js

297 ms

wc-blocks-middleware.js

wc-blocks-middleware.js

305 ms

wc-blocks-data.js

wc-blocks-data.js

268 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

283 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

274 ms

primitives.min.js

primitives.min.js

273 ms

warning.min.js

warning.min.js

279 ms

blocks-components.js

blocks-components.js

269 ms

blocks-checkout.js

blocks-checkout.js

271 ms

order-attribution-blocks.min.js

order-attribution-blocks.min.js

308 ms

flatsome-live-search.js

flatsome-live-search.js

309 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

268 ms

g.gif

g.gif

174 ms

tp.min.js

tp.min.js

199 ms

668693479

668693479

243 ms

flatsome.js

flatsome.js

183 ms

woocommerce.js

woocommerce.js

153 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

139 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

149 ms

zxcvbn-async.min.js

zxcvbn-async.min.js

160 ms

password-strength-meter.min.js

password-strength-meter.min.js

161 ms

password-strength-meter.min.js

password-strength-meter.min.js

174 ms

login.1712157296.js

login.1712157296.js

177 ms

fl-icons.ttf

fl-icons.ttf

254 ms

is_logo250.png

is_logo250.png

198 ms

IS_main_hero_banner-2.jpg

IS_main_hero_banner-2.jpg

217 ms

ford-logo-2017-show.png

ford-logo-2017-show.png

199 ms

Fedex-logo.png

Fedex-logo.png

198 ms

symantec.png

symantec.png

197 ms

UBS-logo.png

UBS-logo.png

269 ms

bluecrossblueshield-1.webp

bluecrossblueshield-1.webp

249 ms

blue_white_pattern_bg.jpg

blue_white_pattern_bg.jpg

249 ms

AcceptCore.js

AcceptCore.js

63 ms

AcceptCore.js

AcceptCore.js

81 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

57 ms

banner.js

banner.js

76 ms

fb.js

fb.js

43 ms

21396566.js

21396566.js

94 ms

Information_Security_Policies_Template_Information_Shield.jpg

Information_Security_Policies_Template_Information_Shield.jpg

198 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

377 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

347 ms

1708111113-0e0f90626e2b6fbc80c985222dd918206c83b351e5e2a77dc26a561e4ce09d06-d

1708111113-0e0f90626e2b6fbc80c985222dd918206c83b351e5e2a77dc26a561e4ce09d06-d

102 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

99 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

145 ms

informationshield.com

informationshield.com

475 ms

flatsome.js

flatsome.js

15 ms

chunk.slider.js

chunk.slider.js

17 ms

chunk.popups.js

chunk.popups.js

16 ms

chunk.tooltips.js

chunk.tooltips.js

26 ms

woocommerce.js

woocommerce.js

13 ms

zxcvbn.min.js

zxcvbn.min.js

56 ms

Accessibility Review

informationshield.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

informationshield.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

informationshield.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Informationshield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Informationshield.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

informationshield.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Information Shield. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: