Tools & Wizards About Us
inframe.ai screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

inframe.ai

The domain name Inframe.ai is for sale

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

221 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

inframe.ai screenshot

About Website

Visit inframe.ai now to see the best up-to-date Inframe content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inframe.ai

The domain name Inframe.ai is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.

Visit inframe.ai

Key Findings

We analyzed Inframe.ai page load time and found that the first response time was 221 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inframe.ai performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inframe.ai

221 ms

inframe.ai

334 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

246 ms

style.min.css

351 ms

blocks.style.build.css

334 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Inframe.ai, 5% (3 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Forms.hsforms.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Inframe.ai.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.5 kB (16%)

Content Size

730.6 kB

After Optimization

612.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inframe.ai main page is 730.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 529.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 81.3 kB

  • Original 100.1 kB
  • After minification 92.0 kB
  • After compression 18.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 27.9 kB

  • Original 529.3 kB
  • After minification 501.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inframe images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 651 B

  • Original 41.9 kB
  • After minification 41.9 kB
  • After compression 41.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 59.2 kB
  • After minification 59.2 kB
  • After compression 50.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inframe.ai needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (40%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inframe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inframe.ai

inframe.ai

221 ms

inframe.ai

inframe.ai

334 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

246 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

351 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

334 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

271 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

268 ms

style.css

style.css

230 ms

custom.css

custom.css

420 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

436 ms

swiper-bundle.css

swiper-bundle.css

470 ms

font-style.css

font-style.css

464 ms

icon-style.css

icon-style.css

502 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

622 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

611 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

609 ms

swiper-bundle.js

swiper-bundle.js

718 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

723 ms

lottie-interactivity.min.js

lottie-interactivity.min.js

90 ms

script.js

script.js

690 ms

v2.js

v2.js

105 ms

cookie-law-info-table.css

cookie-law-info-table.css

839 ms

dismiss.js

dismiss.js

838 ms

genesis-block-theme.js

genesis-block-theme.js

840 ms

progressbar.js

progressbar.js

190 ms

lottie-interactivity.min.js

lottie-interactivity.min.js

14 ms

lottie-interactivity.min.js

lottie-interactivity.min.js

22 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

185 ms

Dashboard-image-1.png

Dashboard-image-1.png

333 ms

flower-hero.gif

flower-hero.gif

988 ms

line1.svg

line1.svg

284 ms

cam.gif

cam.gif

1395 ms

video_img-small1.jpg

video_img-small1.jpg

286 ms

line2.svg

line2.svg

425 ms

wpb-3mb.gif

wpb-3mb.gif

689 ms

Rectangle-24.png

Rectangle-24.png

546 ms

line3.svg

line3.svg

572 ms

jeans.gif

jeans.gif

970 ms

line4.svg

line4.svg

747 ms

video_img-big4.jpg

video_img-big4.jpg

743 ms

hat.gif

hat.gif

2106 ms

Group.png

Group.png

971 ms

arrow1.svg

arrow1.svg

948 ms

arrow2.svg

arrow2.svg

1131 ms

arrow3.svg

arrow3.svg

1154 ms

sdfsf.png

sdfsf.png

1356 ms

unnamed-e1654010325533.png

unnamed-e1654010325533.png

1246 ms

arrow-slider-left.svg

arrow-slider-left.svg

1320 ms

arrow-slider-right.svg

arrow-slider-right.svg

1357 ms

logo-bottom.svg

logo-bottom.svg

1448 ms

logoiab1.svg

logoiab1.svg

1599 ms

logomoat.svg

logomoat.svg

1627 ms

logoamp.svg

logoamp.svg

1605 ms

arrow4.svg

arrow4.svg

1477 ms

json

json

120 ms

GothamProBlack.ttf

GothamProBlack.ttf

1381 ms

GothamProRegular.ttf

GothamProRegular.ttf

1610 ms

gentlemensscript.otf

gentlemensscript.otf

1803 ms

GothamProBold.ttf

GothamProBold.ttf

1537 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

13 ms

json

json

52 ms

btn-bg.svg

btn-bg.svg

1350 ms

Accessibility Review

inframe.ai accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

inframe.ai best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

inframe.ai SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inframe.ai can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inframe.ai main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inframe.ai

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Inframe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: