Tools & Wizards About Us
infrastructuredg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

infrastructuredg.com

Infrastructure Design Group, Inc. | Sioux Falls, SD

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

493 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

753 ms

infrastructuredg.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Infrastructure Dg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about infrastructuredg.com

Infrastructure Design Group, Inc. is a civil engineering and land surveying services firm with offices in Sioux Falls, Mitchell, and Watertown, SD.

Visit infrastructuredg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Infrastructuredg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 493 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

infrastructuredg.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value30.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.infrastructuredg.com

493 ms

theme.min.css

175 ms

frontend.min.css

403 ms

general.min.css

175 ms

eael-139.css

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Infrastructuredg.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) belongs to the original domain Infrastructuredg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (53%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Infrastructuredg.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 978.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 125.8 kB

  • Original 151.6 kB
  • After minification 146.4 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 714.1 kB
  • After minification 712.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Infrastructure Dg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 458.6 kB

  • Original 867.8 kB
  • After minification 867.8 kB
  • After compression 409.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 458.6 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 859.4 kB

  • Original 978.1 kB
  • After minification 974.0 kB
  • After compression 118.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infrastructuredg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 859.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (87%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infrastructure Dg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.infrastructuredg.com

www.infrastructuredg.com

493 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

175 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

403 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

175 ms

eael-139.css

eael-139.css

180 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

295 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

231 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

291 ms

eael-85.css

eael-85.css

237 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

269 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

288 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

295 ms

eael-9.css

eael-9.css

327 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

407 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

347 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

578 ms

post-9.css

post-9.css

409 ms

post-139.css

post-139.css

384 ms

post-85.css

post-85.css

408 ms

post-15.css

post-15.css

442 ms

style.css

style.css

456 ms

css

css

30 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

516 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

464 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

464 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

500 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

513 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

522 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

703 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

510 ms

js

js

89 ms

post-2051.css

post-2051.css

424 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

425 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

602 ms

eael-139.js

eael-139.js

603 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

604 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

605 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

605 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

587 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

586 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

582 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

550 ms

jquery.textareaCounter.plugin.min.js

jquery.textareaCounter.plugin.min.js

532 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

524 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

492 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

471 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

471 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

469 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

467 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

471 ms

datepicker-legacy.min.js

datepicker-legacy.min.js

450 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

414 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

418 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

420 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

387 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

375 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

400 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

476 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

417 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

405 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

398 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

396 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

362 ms

Infrastructre-DG-Logo.svg

Infrastructre-DG-Logo.svg

312 ms

We_Get_You_There-1024x57.png

We_Get_You_There-1024x57.png

320 ms

CS_Bakker_Landing-1024x383.jpg

CS_Bakker_Landing-1024x383.jpg

221 ms

CS_Arrowhead_Pkwy-1024x689.jpg

CS_Arrowhead_Pkwy-1024x689.jpg

323 ms

CS_Exit-3_4-1024x576.jpg

CS_Exit-3_4-1024x576.jpg

271 ms

CS_41st-DDI-1024x767.jpg

CS_41st-DDI-1024x767.jpg

401 ms

font

font

41 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

191 ms

font

font

124 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

265 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

47 ms

Accessibility Review

infrastructuredg.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

infrastructuredg.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

infrastructuredg.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infrastructuredg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infrastructuredg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

infrastructuredg.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Infrastructure Dg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: