Tools & Wizards About Us
infrism.digital screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

infrism.digital

Bespoke digital marketing agency in Birmingham | SEO, SEM & PPC

Page Load Speed

23.7 sec in total

First Response

282 ms

Resources Loaded

22.7 sec

Page Rendered

693 ms

infrism.digital screenshot

About Website

Visit infrism.digital now to see the best up-to-date Infrism content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about infrism.digital

We are a Digital Marketing Agency in Birmingham serving across the UK with our SEO, SEM & PPC expertise. A company that helps businesses promote their products or services online.

Visit infrism.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Infrism.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 282 ms and then it took 23.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

infrism.digital performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,130 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.122

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

infrism.digital

282 ms

infrism.digital

1026 ms

bootstrap.min.css

60 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

72 ms

font-awesome.min.css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Infrism.digital, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Infrism.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (47%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Infrism.digital main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 51.3 kB

  • Original 65.8 kB
  • After minification 63.6 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Infrism needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 238.1 kB

  • Original 554.7 kB
  • After minification 553.9 kB
  • After compression 316.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 238.1 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 222.6 kB

  • Original 257.4 kB
  • After minification 216.5 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infrism.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 222.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (44%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infrism. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

infrism.digital

infrism.digital

282 ms

infrism.digital

infrism.digital

1026 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

60 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

72 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

75 ms

css2

css2

73 ms

adword.css

adword.css

1645 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

515 ms

styles.css

styles.css

268 ms

css

css

77 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

645 ms

style.css

style.css

783 ms

blocks.css

blocks.css

754 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

523 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

600 ms

jquery-3.2.1.slim.min.js

jquery-3.2.1.slim.min.js

694 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

67 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

68 ms

custom.js

custom.js

685 ms

index.js

index.js

772 ms

index.js

index.js

781 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1128 ms

functions.js

functions.js

1272 ms

api.js

api.js

125 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

868 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

957 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1130 ms

index.js

index.js

1130 ms

css

css

12 ms

logo.png

logo.png

438 ms

slide-2.png

slide-2.png

19733 ms

test-min.png

test-min.png

210 ms

slide-3.png

slide-3.png

320 ms

1p.png

1p.png

369 ms

img-2.png

img-2.png

598 ms

Performance.png

Performance.png

432 ms

Specialized.png

Specialized.png

488 ms

talk.png

talk.png

457 ms

adword-icon.png

adword-icon.png

922 ms

bing-ad-1.png

bing-ad-1.png

618 ms

sem_icon.png

sem_icon.png

546 ms

e-commerce_adword_icon.png

e-commerce_adword_icon.png

629 ms

local_adword_icon.png

local_adword_icon.png

632 ms

local_website.png

local_website.png

755 ms

llm_icon.png

llm_icon.png

710 ms

local_sem.png

local_sem.png

744 ms

iphone_1.png

iphone_1.png

722 ms

iphone_2.png

iphone_2.png

1017 ms

call_to_act_2.jpg

call_to_act_2.jpg

811 ms

footer-arrows-4.png

footer-arrows-4.png

1002 ms

footer-arrows-3.png

footer-arrows-3.png

1219 ms

phone_footer.png

phone_footer.png

897 ms

mail_footer.png

mail_footer.png

986 ms

map_footer.png

map_footer.png

1413 ms

2727844643.png

2727844643.png

1072 ms

DtVmJx26TKEr37c9YK5silss7g.ttf

DtVmJx26TKEr37c9YK5silss7g.ttf

145 ms

DtVmJx26TKEr37c9YMptilss7g.ttf

DtVmJx26TKEr37c9YMptilss7g.ttf

168 ms

DtVmJx26TKEr37c9YOZqilss7g.ttf

DtVmJx26TKEr37c9YOZqilss7g.ttf

156 ms

DtVjJx26TKEr37c9aBVJmg.ttf

DtVjJx26TKEr37c9aBVJmg.ttf

168 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

126 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

151 ms

Accessibility Review

infrism.digital accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

infrism.digital best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

infrism.digital SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infrism.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infrism.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

infrism.digital

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Infrism. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: