4.6 sec in total
105 ms
3.7 sec
759 ms
Click here to check amazing Infront content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about infront.com
Infront Webworks- An award winning Colorado Springs SEO website developlment and design company. Digital marketing, PPC and social media.
Visit infront.comWe analyzed Infront.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
infront.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value12.1 s
4/100
10%
Value740 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
105 ms
306 ms
135 ms
89 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Infront.com, 14% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (10 requests) were made to Ws.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (57%)
5.1 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Infront.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 423.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Infront needs image optimization as it can save up to 423.5 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 466.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infront.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 466.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (67%)
101
33
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infront. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
infront.com
105 ms
www.infront.com
306 ms
platform.js
135 ms
jquery.min.js
89 ms
jquery.smint.min.js
105 ms
buttons.js
231 ms
jquery.min.js
87 ms
jquery.cycle.all.latest.js
87 ms
css
107 ms
css
118 ms
foundation.min.css
74 ms
mega-css.css
105 ms
demo.css
108 ms
all.css
111 ms
all.js
133 ms
async-buttons.js
62 ms
pview
131 ms
loader.js
107 ms
arrow-push.png
103 ms
icon-black.png
225 ms
home-button.png
224 ms
infront-webworks-logo.png
224 ms
coderm.jpg
816 ms
testimonial-peeps.png
478 ms
search_button.jpg
477 ms
voted.png
818 ms
buttons-secure.css
53 ms
impl-1_23.js
20 ms
sc
388 ms
widgets.js
973 ms
sdk.js
872 ms
embed
1542 ms
quote-button.png
681 ms
gray-back-tile.png
717 ms
black-but-left.png
752 ms
black-button-right.png
715 ms
social_media_icons2.png
842 ms
footer-border.png
894 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
352 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
468 ms
page
787 ms
p.js
340 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
639 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
751 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
882 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
881 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
885 ms
WFDkXpubrEwopJnSlHV6CC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
885 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
882 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
881 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
1071 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
1072 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxlDMrAYtoOisqqMDW9M_Mqc.ttf
1071 ms
1600064.js
723 ms
ga.js
595 ms
lightbox_screen.png
309 ms
facebook_16.png
246 ms
twitter_16.png
309 ms
linkedin_16.png
309 ms
googleplus_16.png
309 ms
t.dhj
363 ms
postmessageRelay
312 ms
338 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
281 ms
rs=AGLTcCO-_eQ7o1FulFxZ-KCwqhQMrsSSpA
114 ms
t.dhj
160 ms
collect
579 ms
rs=AGLTcCOUSJIRFuWfIxRmYNF0NPW_T9054A
95 ms
rs=AGLTcCMe922Q6xmOdBJBl7J6I2ZmcHJH2g
153 ms
971028622-postmessagerelay.js
440 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
145 ms
photo.jpg
604 ms
googleplus-infront-header.png
603 ms
badges-eaefc7099b8352c2d91a1a3d728dcac7.png
460 ms
t_.js
305 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
123 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
152 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
123 ms
js
372 ms
init_embed.js
370 ms
rs=AGLTcCMe922Q6xmOdBJBl7J6I2ZmcHJH2g
158 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
42 ms
generic
328 ms
ga-audiences
132 ms
index.html
172 ms
st.a922abe131683978f58e2daa28a63c1c.js
47 ms
173 ms
generic
6 ms
generic
6 ms
tpid=CvQEBlmvHLQAAAARXeQHAw%3D%3D
364 ms
ttd
94 ms
50962
168 ms
pixel
49 ms
nlsn
11 ms
cs
11 ms
cs
12 ms
4470
78 ms
common.js
104 ms
map.js
126 ms
google4.png
81 ms
overlay.js
76 ms
wcm
256 ms
__ptq.gif
274 ms
1600064.js
362 ms
1600064.js
270 ms
util.js
96 ms
onion.js
96 ms
search_impl.js
96 ms
like.php
205 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
90 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
164 ms
transparent.png
101 ms
kh
240 ms
controls.js
21 ms
LfVJGohmYZB.js
160 ms
lH1ibRl5GKq.png
151 ms
css
45 ms
mapcnt6.png
91 ms
vt
149 ms
vt
130 ms
vt
146 ms
vt
175 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
20 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
20 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
22 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
20 ms
vt
97 ms
infront.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
infront.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
infront.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infront.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infront.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infront.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Infront. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: