4.5 sec in total
586 ms
2.7 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Inggeo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inggeo.ru
Инженерная геодезия, обмерные работы
Visit inggeo.ruWe analyzed Inggeo.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 586 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
inggeo.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
586 ms
622 ms
274 ms
273 ms
274 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Inggeo.ru, 5% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 2% (1 request) were made to Bs.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Inggeo.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 179.1 kB (37%)
485.3 kB
306.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Inggeo.ru main page is 485.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 348.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Inggeo needs image optimization as it can save up to 85.5 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 68.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inggeo.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (37%)
38
24
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inggeo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
inggeo.ru
586 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
622 ms
lightbox.min.js
274 ms
lightbox.css
273 ms
dd.js
274 ms
ddscreen.css
276 ms
3_1_EC7520FF_CC5500FF_0_pageviews
345 ms
valid-html401-blue
233 ms
bg_site.jpg
245 ms
close.png
246 ms
loading.gif
243 ms
prev.png
241 ms
next.png
243 ms
korob.png
663 ms
corner_01.jpg
369 ms
left_tbl_top.gif
368 ms
corner_02.gif
375 ms
center_tbl_top.gif
374 ms
right_tbl_top.gif
380 ms
corner_03.jpg
548 ms
bg_leftside.jpg
548 ms
bg_02.jpg
556 ms
main_view.jpg
703 ms
spacer.gif
560 ms
us_1.jpg
698 ms
us_2.jpg
1005 ms
us_3.jpg
877 ms
us_4.jpg
1040 ms
us_5.jpg
820 ms
bg_rightside.jpg
864 ms
corner_04.jpg
857 ms
left_tbl_footer.jpg
973 ms
center_tbl_footer.jpg
1018 ms
right_tbl_footer.jpg
1015 ms
watch.js
22 ms
bg_head.jpg
1178 ms
left_tbl_bg.gif
1107 ms
bg_h1.gif
1131 ms
watch.js
114 ms
bg_04.gif
989 ms
bg_footer.jpg
983 ms
ddprint.css
177 ms
inggeo.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
inggeo.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
inggeo.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inggeo.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Inggeo.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inggeo.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inggeo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: