Tools & Wizards About Us
ingic.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

ingic.uk

Best Design & Development Agency in US. Ranked # 1 for Top-notch Services | INGIC

Page Load Speed

39.6 sec in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

36 sec

Page Rendered

3.5 sec

ingic.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit ingic.uk now to see the best up-to-date INGIC content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ingic.uk

INGIC US is a top-ranked digital agency backed by the best designers, developers and Marketers in United States. INGIC creates leading-edge software, mobile apps & digital marketing strategies, making...

Visit ingic.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Ingic.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 39.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

ingic.uk performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value69.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20,660 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.297

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value52.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ingic.uk

127 ms

css

49 ms

style.css

11198 ms

platform.js

45 ms

jquery-1.11.1.js

910 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Ingic.uk, 12% (9 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 9% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ingic.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 188.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ingic.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 61.8 kB
  • After minification 48.2 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.5 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 51.6 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INGIC images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 81.6 kB

  • Original 274.2 kB
  • After minification 274.1 kB
  • After compression 192.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 81.6 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 42.5 kB
  • After minification 42.5 kB
  • After compression 38.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ingic.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (58%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INGIC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ingic.uk

ingic.uk

127 ms

css

css

49 ms

style.css

style.css

11198 ms

platform.js

platform.js

45 ms

jquery-1.11.1.js

jquery-1.11.1.js

910 ms

xlib.js

xlib.js

914 ms

script.js

script.js

786 ms

form.js

form.js

787 ms

chatscript.js

chatscript.js

59 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

43 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

80 ms

new-request-sidebtn.png

new-request-sidebtn.png

69 ms

header-logo-small.png

header-logo-small.png

308 ms

new-sprite.png

new-sprite.png

308 ms

poster-3.png

poster-3.png

2892 ms

video-overlay.png

video-overlay.png

68 ms

porsche-banner.jpg

porsche-banner.jpg

2889 ms

citizen-banner.jpg

citizen-banner.jpg

5516 ms

lg-banner.jpg

lg-banner.jpg

5635 ms

renault-banner.jpg

renault-banner.jpg

5583 ms

dubaiairport-banner.jpg

dubaiairport-banner.jpg

5570 ms

education-banner.jpg

education-banner.jpg

5508 ms

qatar-banner.jpg

qatar-banner.jpg

5543 ms

gpca-banner.jpg

gpca-banner.jpg

19808 ms

sprite-client-home.png

sprite-client-home.png

8432 ms

homepg-two-box1.jpg

homepg-two-box1.jpg

13742 ms

homepg-two-box2.jpg

homepg-two-box2.jpg

19808 ms

ingicdesign.ttf

ingicdesign.ttf

8398 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

41 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

41 ms

badge.html

badge.html

242 ms

default

default

360 ms

2252433214786765

2252433214786765

368 ms

260 ms

bat.js

bat.js

211 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

276 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

224 ms

latest.js

latest.js

508 ms

jsonip.com

jsonip.com

395 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

233 ms

countrylist.xml

countrylist.xml

12463 ms

FindGeoLocation

FindGeoLocation

310 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

95 ms

badge.css

badge.css

28 ms

api.js

api.js

29 ms

badge_compiled.js

badge_compiled.js

50 ms

5681189.js

5681189.js

133 ms

5511066.js

5511066.js

179 ms

css

css

29 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

37 ms

78 ms

1832714284-postmessagerelay.js

1832714284-postmessagerelay.js

58 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

41 ms

proxy.html

proxy.html

66 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

12 ms

5681189

5681189

163 ms

5511066

5511066

51 ms

googlelogo_color_150x54dp.png

googlelogo_color_150x54dp.png

15 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

22 ms

GetProjectWithUsers

GetProjectWithUsers

72 ms

15 ms

track

track

350 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

182 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

173 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

404 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

471 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

469 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

285 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

285 ms

homepg-two-box2.jpg

homepg-two-box2.jpg

4644 ms

widget-settings

widget-settings

151 ms

c.gif

c.gif

60 ms

en.js

en.js

13 ms

Accessibility Review

ingic.uk accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ingic.uk best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ingic.uk SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ingic.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ingic.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ingic.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of INGIC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: