Tools & Wizards About Us
ingood.agency screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

ingood.agency

InGood - a technology, marketing and production company. Do things that make you happy.

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

372 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

54 ms

ingood.agency screenshot

About Website

Visit ingood.agency now to see the best up-to-date In Good content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ingood.agency

InGood is a brand new marketing and communication agency, that provides digital and tech experience, communication strategies, video and photo content with a fluid-structure, top curriculum teams and ...

Visit ingood.agency

Key Findings

We analyzed Ingood.agency page load time and found that the first response time was 372 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ingood.agency performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value27.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,340 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.4 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ingood.agency

372 ms

js

65 ms

js

133 ms

bootstrap.min.css

183 ms

animsition.min.css

270 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Ingood.agency, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (848 ms) belongs to the original domain Ingood.agency.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 144.6 kB (33%)

Content Size

436.6 kB

After Optimization

292.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ingood.agency main page is 436.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 275.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 31.6 kB

  • Original 38.4 kB
  • After minification 29.8 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 70.6 kB

  • Original 275.0 kB
  • After minification 275.0 kB
  • After compression 204.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 42.4 kB

  • Original 123.2 kB
  • After minification 123.2 kB
  • After compression 80.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ingood.agency needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (76%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In Good. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ingood.agency

ingood.agency

372 ms

js

js

65 ms

js

js

133 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

183 ms

animsition.min.css

animsition.min.css

270 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

373 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

376 ms

socicon.css

socicon.css

357 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

386 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

367 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

385 ms

jquery.pagepiling.css

jquery.pagepiling.css

441 ms

jquery.mb.vimeo_player.min.css

jquery.mb.vimeo_player.min.css

451 ms

aos.css

aos.css

56 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

50 ms

style.css

style.css

542 ms

ingood.css

ingood.css

461 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

123 ms

blazorise.bootstrap.css

blazorise.bootstrap.css

476 ms

529454971

529454971

210 ms

IGtech-negative.svg

IGtech-negative.svg

477 ms

526128133

526128133

207 ms

blazor.server.js

blazor.server.js

683 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

55 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

553 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

553 ms

animsition.min.js

animsition.min.js

563 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

571 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

635 ms

jquery.pagepiling.min.js

jquery.pagepiling.min.js

645 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

644 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

656 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

746 ms

ScrollMagic.min.js

ScrollMagic.min.js

716 ms

animation.gsap.min.js

animation.gsap.min.js

729 ms

jquery.viewport.js

jquery.viewport.js

728 ms

jquery.countdown.min.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

743 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

54 ms

script.js

script.js

777 ms

player.js

player.js

81 ms

yall.min.js

yall.min.js

796 ms

829f7317f7.js

829f7317f7.js

123 ms

IG-content-negative.svg

IG-content-negative.svg

826 ms

IGcomm-negative.svg

IGcomm-negative.svg

828 ms

red-orange-ball.svg

red-orange-ball.svg

841 ms

accent-green.svg

accent-green.svg

843 ms

accent-red.svg

accent-red.svg

848 ms

js

js

79 ms

InGood-negative.svg

InGood-negative.svg

703 ms

css

css

31 ms

css

css

44 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

48 ms

961a181da27e7cbc072ec2fb5bbfe2a9.woff

961a181da27e7cbc072ec2fb5bbfe2a9.woff

373 ms

red-ball.svg

red-ball.svg

360 ms

accent-green2.svg

accent-green2.svg

362 ms

Accessibility Review

ingood.agency accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ingood.agency best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ingood.agency SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ingood.agency can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ingood.agency main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ingood.agency

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of In Good. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: