Tools & Wizards About Us
ingramdrilling.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ingramdrilling.com

Ingram Drilling – Serving Northern Colorado and Southern Wyoming

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

149 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

405 ms

ingramdrilling.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ingram Drilling content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ingramdrilling.com

Visit ingramdrilling.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ingramdrilling.com page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ingramdrilling.com performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ingramdrilling.com

149 ms

ingramdrilling.com

296 ms

frontend.css

58 ms

dashicons.min.css

171 ms

everest-forms.css

165 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Ingramdrilling.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (631 ms) belongs to the original domain Ingramdrilling.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.5 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ingramdrilling.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 939.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 76.0 kB

  • Original 90.9 kB
  • After minification 89.0 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 939.9 kB
  • After minification 932.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ingram Drilling images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 114.6 kB
  • After minification 114.6 kB
  • After compression 113.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 120.9 kB
  • After minification 120.9 kB
  • After compression 117.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ingramdrilling.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (72%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ingram Drilling. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ingramdrilling.com

ingramdrilling.com

149 ms

ingramdrilling.com

ingramdrilling.com

296 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

58 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

171 ms

everest-forms.css

everest-forms.css

165 ms

intlTelInput.css

intlTelInput.css

162 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

171 ms

jet-elements.css

jet-elements.css

220 ms

jet-elements-skin.css

jet-elements-skin.css

169 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

215 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

214 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

218 ms

post-12.css

post-12.css

216 ms

global.css

global.css

225 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

267 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

267 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

267 ms

post-2.css

post-2.css

270 ms

post-19.css

post-19.css

269 ms

post-37.css

post-37.css

269 ms

global.min.css

global.min.css

319 ms

header.min.css

header.min.css

320 ms

content.min.css

content.min.css

321 ms

footer.min.css

footer.min.css

322 ms

css

css

48 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

318 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

377 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

366 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

367 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

371 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

375 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

375 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

420 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

421 ms

jet-elements.min.js

jet-elements.min.js

476 ms

bbb_a_rating_logo-1024x414.png

bbb_a_rating_logo-1024x414.png

480 ms

2.png

2.png

480 ms

IMG_3491-768x1024.jpeg

IMG_3491-768x1024.jpeg

530 ms

IMG_1612-768x1024.jpeg

IMG_1612-768x1024.jpeg

631 ms

IMG_7202-1024x768.jpeg

IMG_7202-1024x768.jpeg

582 ms

IMG_6090-1024x768.jpeg

IMG_6090-1024x768.jpeg

531 ms

IMG_0222-1024x768.jpeg

IMG_0222-1024x768.jpeg

427 ms

memberCeLogo_small-1.png

memberCeLogo_small-1.png

373 ms

kbclouds.jpg

kbclouds.jpg

235 ms

font

font

17 ms

Accessibility Review

ingramdrilling.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ingramdrilling.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ingramdrilling.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ingramdrilling.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ingramdrilling.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ingramdrilling.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ingram Drilling. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: