Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

initiativv.com

initiativv.com - initiativv Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

227 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

74 ms

initiativv.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to initiativv.com homepage info - get ready to check Initiativv best content right away, or after learning these important things about initiativv.com

initiativv.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, initiativv.com has it all. We hope you fi...

Visit initiativv.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Initiativv.com page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

initiativv.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

227 ms

common.js

76 ms

tj.js

148 ms

2022hehuan_common.php

600 ms

2022hehuan_common.php

599 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Initiativv.com, 25% (2 requests) were made to Otevjm.com and 25% (2 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Js.users.51.la.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 919 B (27%)

Content Size

3.4 kB

After Optimization

2.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Initiativv.com main page is 3.4 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 534 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 623 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 534 B or 46% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 385 B

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 385 B or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (60%)

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Initiativv. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

initiativv.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

initiativv.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

initiativv.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GB2312

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Initiativv.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Initiativv.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Initiativv. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: