18.3 sec in total
1.9 sec
15.8 sec
494 ms
Visit inke.org now to see the best up-to-date Inke content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inke.org
Visit inke.orgWe analyzed Inke.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 16.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
inke.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.03
100/100
15%
Value5.5 s
71/100
10%
1931 ms
1398 ms
1594 ms
612 ms
591 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (103 requests) were addressed to the original Inke.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Inke.org.
Page size can be reduced by 241.8 kB (14%)
1.8 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Inke.org main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.7 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inke images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 101.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inke.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (63%)
104
39
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inke. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
inke.org
1931 ms
common.css
1398 ms
jquery-1.5.1.min.js
1594 ms
home.js
612 ms
main.js
591 ms
main.css
309 ms
bg_sub.gif
208 ms
logo.gif
199 ms
gnb_eng.gif
396 ms
gnb_map.gif
201 ms
gnb_fav.gif
398 ms
gnb_home.gif
800 ms
lnb_1.gif
592 ms
snb_bg.gif
790 ms
snb_1_1.gif
601 ms
snb_1_2.gif
992 ms
snb_1_3.gif
996 ms
snb_1_4.gif
790 ms
snb_1_6.gif
1195 ms
snb_1_8.gif
1391 ms
snb_2_1.gif
1192 ms
snb_2_4.gif
1393 ms
snb_1_9.gif
1593 ms
lnb_4.gif
1592 ms
snb_4_2.gif
1788 ms
snb_4_3.gif
1796 ms
snb_4_13.gif
1595 ms
snb_4_11.gif
1593 ms
snb_4_52.gif
1788 ms
lnb_6.gif
1986 ms
snb_6_1.gif
1994 ms
snb_6_2.gif
2182 ms
snb_6_3.gif
2387 ms
lnb_7.gif
2190 ms
snb_7_1.gif
2393 ms
snb_7_2.gif
2586 ms
lnb_9.gif
2592 ms
snb_9_2.gif
2782 ms
snb_9_3.gif
2789 ms
snb_9_4.gif
2586 ms
snb_9_7.gif
2991 ms
snb_9_5.gif
2976 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
collect
23 ms
search.gif
3002 ms
tit_1.gif
2992 ms
login.gif
3191 ms
btn_webzin.gif
2995 ms
join.gif
3190 ms
find_2.gif
3015 ms
tit_2.gif
3184 ms
tit_3.gif
3015 ms
tel.gif
3193 ms
tit_4.gif
3203 ms
banner_1.gif
3188 ms
banner_2.gif
3216 ms
world_map.gif
3633 ms
tit_5.gif
3213 ms
more.gif
3216 ms
tit_6.gif
3411 ms
tit_7.gif
3415 ms
AA_10926323_1.jpg
3646 ms
tit_8.gif
3611 ms
coverdcover.jpg
10578 ms
450-290.jpg
3850 ms
tit_9.gif
4021 ms
more_2.gif
3410 ms
g_1.gif
3854 ms
go.gif
4016 ms
g_2.gif
3870 ms
venture_7.jpg
4304 ms
venture_61.jpg
4216 ms
venture_5.jpg
4311 ms
g_7.gif
4216 ms
g_81.gif
4322 ms
g_9.gif
4531 ms
g_10.gif
4555 ms
vizline.jpg
4602 ms
tit_10.gif
4551 ms
sample_4.gif
4605 ms
bn_com.gif
4551 ms
menu_1.gif
4747 ms
menu_2.gif
4210 ms
menu_3.gif
4604 ms
site_close.gif
4213 ms
sns_1.gif
4544 ms
sns_2.gif
4413 ms
address.gif
4545 ms
search_bg.gif
4564 ms
search_form_bg_1.gif
4595 ms
icon_search.gif
4177 ms
search_form_bg_2.gif
4533 ms
time_bg.gif
4384 ms
gallery_bg.gif
4346 ms
bg.gif
3941 ms
site_bg.gif
4367 ms
site_list_bg.gif
4416 ms
logo.gif
4022 ms
am.gif
211 ms
time_0.gif
200 ms
time_8.gif
611 ms
time_bar.gif
395 ms
time_4.gif
593 ms
pm.gif
407 ms
time_6.gif
807 ms
inke.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
inke.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
inke.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inke.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Inke.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inke.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inke. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: