Tools & Wizards About Us
inkjetink.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

inkjetink.de

Druckerpatronen, Tintenpatronen und Toner von Peach.

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

472 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

91 ms

inkjetink.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to inkjetink.de homepage info - get ready to check Inkjetink best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about inkjetink.de

Peach Druckerpatronen. DIE Alternative zu teuren original Tintenpatronen! Ihr Ansprechpartner für Druckerpatronen, Toner, digitale Fotografie und Bürogeräte. Günstige Preise - hohe Qualität.

Visit inkjetink.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Inkjetink.de page load time and found that the first response time was 472 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inkjetink.de performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inkjetink.de

472 ms

www.inkjetink.de

272 ms

www.inkjetink.de

443 ms

modernproducts.css

93 ms

screen.css

186 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Inkjetink.de, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (472 ms) belongs to the original domain Inkjetink.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 22.1 kB (23%)

Content Size

97.3 kB

After Optimization

75.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inkjetink.de main page is 97.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 60.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 20.4 kB
  • After minification 18.0 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 5.2 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Inkjetink needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 60.3 kB
  • After minification 60.3 kB
  • After compression 55.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 11.4 kB
  • After minification 11.4 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inkjetink.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (72%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inkjetink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inkjetink.de

inkjetink.de

472 ms

www.inkjetink.de

www.inkjetink.de

272 ms

www.inkjetink.de

www.inkjetink.de

443 ms

modernproducts.css

modernproducts.css

93 ms

screen.css

screen.css

186 ms

parts.css

parts.css

273 ms

menu.js

menu.js

276 ms

position.js

position.js

276 ms

func.js

func.js

278 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

372 ms

jq-innerfade.js

jq-innerfade.js

277 ms

tablesorter.css

tablesorter.css

361 ms

tabledef.css

tabledef.css

364 ms

tablesorter.js

tablesorter.js

366 ms

jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.min.js

jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.min.js

367 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

20 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

84 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

91 ms

head_navi.gif

head_navi.gif

91 ms

lidl_logo.png

lidl_logo.png

91 ms

info15.gif

info15.gif

91 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

90 ms

navigation_title_grey.gif

navigation_title_grey.gif

92 ms

search2.gif

search2.gif

178 ms

icon_suche.png

icon_suche.png

131 ms

foot.gif

foot.gif

308 ms

print.css

print.css

91 ms

Accessibility Review

inkjetink.de accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

inkjetink.de best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

inkjetink.de SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inkjetink.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inkjetink.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inkjetink.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inkjetink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: