5 sec in total
837 ms
4 sec
170 ms
Visit inmar.net now to see the best up-to-date Inmar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inmar.net
Продвижение сайтов, контекстная реклама, комплексный интернет-маркетинга от агентства ИнМар.
Visit inmar.netWe analyzed Inmar.net page load time and found that the first response time was 837 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
inmar.net performance score
837 ms
128 ms
250 ms
260 ms
257 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Inmar.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Inmar.net.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (39%)
2.9 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Inmar.net main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 232.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Inmar needs image optimization as it can save up to 232.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 310.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 310.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 556.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inmar.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 556.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (60%)
68
27
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inmar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
inmar.net.ru
837 ms
style.css
128 ms
k2.css
250 ms
template.css
260 ms
general.css
257 ms
system.css
256 ms
bootstrap.css
382 ms
font-awesome.css
260 ms
template-blue.css
510 ms
pattern.css
396 ms
jquery.miniColors.css
376 ms
responsive.css
392 ms
responsive.css
502 ms
css
25 ms
font-awesome.css
522 ms
glyphicon.css
523 ms
shortcodes.css
523 ms
styles.css
525 ms
styles.css
626 ms
template.css
626 ms
jquery.min.js
761 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
631 ms
mootools-core.js
766 ms
core.js
644 ms
jquery.min.js
878 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
746 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
755 ms
k2.js
769 ms
caption.js
867 ms
bootstrap.min.js
883 ms
keepmenu.js
883 ms
yt-script.js
890 ms
ytcpanel.js
895 ms
jquery.miniColors.min.js
988 ms
yt-extend.js
1001 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1010 ms
jquery.megamenu.js
1008 ms
gooeymenu.js
904 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
785 ms
system.css
869 ms
prettify.js
916 ms
shortcodes.js
923 ms
html5fallback.js
919 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
807 ms
bg_body.png
1130 ms
bg_login.png
257 ms
en.gif
125 ms
fr.gif
130 ms
logo_s.png
132 ms
white.gif
130 ms
rating_star.png
248 ms
rating_star_blank.png
254 ms
btnSearch.png
249 ms
icon-mail.png
252 ms
icon-skype.png
363 ms
loading.gif
367 ms
icon_views.png
367 ms
btnMail.png
368 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
13 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
609 ms
pattern1.png
712 ms
pattern2.png
479 ms
pattern3.png
733 ms
pattern4.png
482 ms
pattern5.png
606 ms
pattern6.jpg
997 ms
pattern7.jpg
994 ms
pattern8.jpg
1382 ms
bg-cpanel-head.png
835 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
832 ms
dk_arrows.png
884 ms
trigger.png
920 ms
inmar.net SEO score
EN
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inmar.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Inmar.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inmar.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inmar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: