Tools & Wizards About Us
inmemory.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

inmemory.net

InMemory.Net – Blisteringly fast In-Memory Database for .Net

Page Load Speed

525 ms in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

404 ms

Page Rendered

89 ms

inmemory.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to inmemory.net homepage info - get ready to check In Memory best content right away, or after learning these important things about inmemory.net

In less than a second InMemory.Net can query hundreds of millions of data rows on a server or tens of millions from a simple desktop. Designed to run with Dot Net 4.0 or above, InMemory.Net allows Dot...

Visit inmemory.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Inmemory.net page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 493 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inmemory.net performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inmemory.net

32 ms

inmemory.net

39 ms

webfont.js

334 ms

66 ms

dashicons.min.css

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Inmemory.net, 26% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.wp.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts-api.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (334 ms) belongs to the original domain Inmemory.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

357.0 kB

After Optimization

320.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inmemory.net main page is 357.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 212.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 36.0 kB

  • Original 47.2 kB
  • After minification 46.1 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 212.4 kB
  • After minification 212.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. In Memory images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 486 B

  • Original 61.7 kB
  • After minification 61.7 kB
  • After compression 61.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 35.7 kB
  • After minification 35.7 kB
  • After compression 35.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inmemory.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (45%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In Memory. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inmemory.net

inmemory.net

32 ms

inmemory.net

inmemory.net

39 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

334 ms

66 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

17 ms

css

css

44 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

22 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

19 ms

bilmur.min.js

bilmur.min.js

23 ms

122 ms

e-202435.js

e-202435.js

24 ms

speedometer.png

speedometer.png

24 ms

header21.jpg

header21.jpg

15 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

16 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

20 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

5 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

5 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

2 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

6 ms

Accessibility Review

inmemory.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

inmemory.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

inmemory.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inmemory.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inmemory.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inmemory.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of In Memory. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: