9 sec in total
1.1 sec
7.2 sec
654 ms
Click here to check amazing INNAPACK content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about innapack.com
Innapack (PT. Trimitra Indoplast Mandiri) is a film based flexible packaging manufacturing based in Cikarang, West Java, Indonesia.
Visit innapack.comWe analyzed Innapack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
innapack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value11.9 s
4/100
10%
Value1,190 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
1104 ms
790 ms
26 ms
840 ms
772 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Innapack.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Innapack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (61%)
4.5 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Innapack.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 102.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, INNAPACK needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 MB or 66% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Innapack.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (57%)
58
25
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INNAPACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
innapack.com
1104 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
790 ms
style.min.css
26 ms
classic-themes.min.css
840 ms
styles.css
772 ms
js_composer.min.css
841 ms
css
31 ms
bootstrap.css
36 ms
flexslider.min.css
46 ms
prettyPhoto.css
62 ms
font-awesome.min.css
73 ms
animate.min.css
86 ms
theme-styles.css
94 ms
theme-features.css
108 ms
style.css
118 ms
css
40 ms
jquery.min.js
899 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
973 ms
email-decode.min.js
601 ms
js_composer_tta.min.css
616 ms
index.js
1394 ms
index.js
1440 ms
api.js
56 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1469 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1441 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1510 ms
index.js
1638 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
2192 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
2217 ms
jquery.sticky.js
2268 ms
scripts.js
2253 ms
wbc-int.js
2283 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
2425 ms
vc-accordion.min.js
2982 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
2481 ms
innapack-min.png
1697 ms
Machine-HIGH-SPEED-ROTOGRAVURE-PRINTING-PRESS.png
2240 ms
Untitled-2-1.png
1509 ms
Machine-HIGH-SPEED-ROTOGRAVURE-PRINTING-PRESS-360x240.png
1512 ms
iso2.png
1513 ms
post-type-place-holder-360x240.jpg
1514 ms
post-type-place-holder.jpg
2538 ms
post-type-place-holder-500x500.jpg
2383 ms
parallax-place-holder.jpg
2726 ms
2.jpg
2486 ms
3.jpg
2933 ms
courier-bags-1.jpg
3030 ms
diaper-bags-1.jpg
3036 ms
shopping-bags-1.jpg
3682 ms
heavy-duty-bags-1.jpg
3621 ms
plastic-liners-1.jpg
3498 ms
6.jpg
4273 ms
5.jpg
4438 ms
1.jpg
4125 ms
with-gusset.png
4275 ms
Rectangle-17.png
3633 ms
team-place-holder.jpg
3577 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
56 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
86 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
106 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
107 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
4606 ms
recaptcha__en.js
155 ms
iso-300x63.jpg
3862 ms
innapack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
innapack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
innapack.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Innapack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Innapack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
innapack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INNAPACK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: