6.9 sec in total
639 ms
5.7 sec
541 ms
Click here to check amazing Innoget content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about innoget.com
Innovation network and open innovation referent, Innoget is the trusted innovation network to innovate with the right partners. Click for more.
Visit innoget.comWe analyzed Innoget.com page load time and found that the first response time was 639 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
innoget.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value8.5 s
17/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
639 ms
2166 ms
42 ms
106 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Innoget.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Static1.innoget.com and 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Innoget.com.
Page size can be reduced by 539.6 kB (18%)
2.9 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Innoget.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 473.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Innoget needs image optimization as it can save up to 473.7 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Innoget.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (21%)
57
45
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Innoget. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
innoget.com
639 ms
www.innoget.com
2166 ms
all.css
42 ms
icon-font.min.css
106 ms
css
39 ms
css
63 ms
landing.bootstrap.min.css
393 ms
homeoffpage.css
298 ms
footer-offpage.css
300 ms
jquery.min.js
21 ms
bootstrap.min.js
55 ms
landing.smoothscroll.js
286 ms
jquery.carouFredSel.js
398 ms
jquery.clamp.js
288 ms
footer.js
500 ms
cookie-consent.js
439 ms
innoget-logo.png
730 ms
Profiles.jpg
717 ms
Jobs.jpg
738 ms
5b56fabb88fe8.jpg
727 ms
7c389a17d75344c41be5baa46dcb0dae23778991.png
876 ms
f5095caa57393dec7d7a635e521f2b7c28673806.png
937 ms
dbb5cd7dc5071234810289b702e43460239d9562.png
808 ms
1125 ms
50f4b0b1e56e84cd5f188462f25f4c4640efb48b.png
1095 ms
esa-logo.png
710 ms
3b8567bf47e2d599233241e811fb81b88ade0782.png
1080 ms
5fc00f71160184aefa4e2c130589aec68f329717.png
1089 ms
stats.jpg
724 ms
secure-data-badge.svg
790 ms
609a2fb915b47.jpg
862 ms
meet.jpg
789 ms
a5413a303500217a97a9b76e1eb6b16278e3f44b.png
1063 ms
innoget-logo-full.svg
792 ms
7585cdedf6d76d3d80d13d8bef8d0db0f0c22a1b.png
1036 ms
iaea-logo.png
762 ms
beiersdorf-logo.png
781 ms
fraunhofer-logo.png
793 ms
read.jpg
798 ms
gdpr-compliant-badge.svg
801 ms
ab5c9f2deadb061956703934c9ee1a635552fc53.png
889 ms
pepsico-logo.png
796 ms
Posts.jpg
699 ms
496a73f49e757b71088be2712724911aba3491f6.png
706 ms
3eeccf8a1069009d1c9c4bb99db681d174758632.png
1026 ms
exposure.jpg
777 ms
logo-innoget-social.svg
792 ms
grid-users-w.jpg
901 ms
bg-jobs.png
721 ms
cf08029322784e862906c639ed1c8f1e064abc47.png
1005 ms
b36705ac262e99865f02d2d00597eca1cf4da3e9.jpg
1201 ms
ce8d2a42d38abcd65f2020c9475f7446a4e28dac.png
1233 ms
cta-bg-h.svg
706 ms
b678ae4f4db0b28ab1be068d1f81d40d27ed87f3.png
952 ms
7eb80dd67a88c9e1fe5693d31c559f0176414af5.png
874 ms
933726db36e6d96f915d9bc508112b7f4db3a854.png
915 ms
722fd98e2b8ac812cf70f1c105f576ba62e39338.png
1065 ms
electrolux-logo.png
795 ms
Circle.png
1180 ms
gartner-badge.svg
1160 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
168 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
295 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
294 ms
Linearicons-Free.ttf
52 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
52 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
77 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
303 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
304 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
304 ms
642 ms
innoget.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
innoget.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
innoget.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Innoget.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Innoget.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
innoget.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Innoget. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: