Tools & Wizards About Us
innograph.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

innograph.com

InnoGRAPH | Digital Signage & Display Promotion

Page Load Speed

13.7 sec in total

First Response

2.6 sec

Resources Loaded

10.6 sec

Page Rendered

548 ms

innograph.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to innograph.com homepage info - get ready to check InnoGRAPH best content for Indonesia right away, or after learning these important things about innograph.com

See our Complete Solution for your need in Digital Signage & Display Promotion

Visit innograph.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Innograph.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 11.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

innograph.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

innograph.com

2590 ms

block_edit.css

593 ms

css_b001b2562e30fb6911071c482dba23bf.css

1717 ms

js_6ea1aebc66ef3eb806922d05940f8690.js

2334 ms

block_edit.js

608 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Innograph.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to S46.sitemeter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Innograph.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 449.9 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Innograph.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 27.5 kB

  • Original 35.3 kB
  • After minification 32.3 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 189.8 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, InnoGRAPH needs image optimization as it can save up to 189.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 184.2 kB

  • Original 285.0 kB
  • After minification 246.9 kB
  • After compression 100.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 48.4 kB

  • Original 61.0 kB
  • After minification 59.3 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Innograph.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (45%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of InnoGRAPH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

innograph.com

innograph.com

2590 ms

block_edit.css

block_edit.css

593 ms

css_b001b2562e30fb6911071c482dba23bf.css

css_b001b2562e30fb6911071c482dba23bf.css

1717 ms

js_6ea1aebc66ef3eb806922d05940f8690.js

js_6ea1aebc66ef3eb806922d05940f8690.js

2334 ms

block_edit.js

block_edit.js

608 ms

counter.js

counter.js

24 ms

counter.js

counter.js

27 ms

counter.asp

counter.asp

10 ms

js_77d33a489d9820ea624d6f57f8f1b553.js

js_77d33a489d9820ea624d6f57f8f1b553.js

855 ms

mystyle.css

mystyle.css

327 ms

myjquery.js

myjquery.js

310 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

129 ms

online

online

104 ms

online

online

89 ms

body_bg.png

body_bg.png

369 ms

menu_secondary_left.png

menu_secondary_left.png

364 ms

menu_secondary_right.png

menu_secondary_right.png

364 ms

menu_secondary_bg.png

menu_secondary_bg.png

366 ms

divider.png

divider.png

364 ms

en.png

en.png

599 ms

id.png

id.png

583 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1211 ms

menu_left.png

menu_left.png

607 ms

menu_right.png

menu_right.png

603 ms

menu_bg.png

menu_bg.png

608 ms

menu_active_left.png

menu_active_left.png

882 ms

menu_active_right.png

menu_active_right.png

906 ms

main_top_edge.png

main_top_edge.png

912 ms

main_top_bg.png

main_top_bg.png

923 ms

main_bottom_bg.png

main_bottom_bg.png

922 ms

content_bg.png

content_bg.png

1666 ms

banner%20ISG%20produk%20baru-01.jpg

banner%20ISG%20produk%20baru-01.jpg

3293 ms

Galerry.jpg

Galerry.jpg

3494 ms

IMG_0088_1.jpg

IMG_0088_1.jpg

2721 ms

line.png

line.png

1221 ms

line_dot_v.png

line_dot_v.png

1555 ms

showcase_active.png

showcase_active.png

1553 ms

block_left_header_left_bg.png

block_left_header_left_bg.png

1836 ms

box_top_left.png

box_top_left.png

1864 ms

box_top_right.png

box_top_right.png

1934 ms

icon%20Digital%20n%20LED%20Display.jpg

icon%20Digital%20n%20LED%20Display.jpg

2998 ms

icon%20Promotion%20counter.jpg

icon%20Promotion%20counter.jpg

2460 ms

icon%20Portable%20Display%20rev1%20copy.jpg

icon%20Portable%20Display%20rev1%20copy.jpg

3903 ms

Icon%20FD%20System%20copy.jpg

Icon%20FD%20System%20copy.jpg

3050 ms

icon%20Graphic%20%26%20Banner.jpg

icon%20Graphic%20%26%20Banner.jpg

3611 ms

icon%20Lightbox%202_0.jpg

icon%20Lightbox%202_0.jpg

3912 ms

icon%20Frame%20rev.jpg

icon%20Frame%20rev.jpg

3656 ms

icon%20Info%20Sign%20%26%20Floorstand%20Rev1.jpg

icon%20Info%20Sign%20%26%20Floorstand%20Rev1.jpg

3900 ms

icon%20Brochure%20Dispencer.jpg

icon%20Brochure%20Dispencer.jpg

3838 ms

meter.asp

meter.asp

26 ms

mpp.vindicosuite.com

mpp.vindicosuite.com

59 ms

icon%20Product%20Display%20copy_1.jpg

icon%20Product%20Display%20copy_1.jpg

4448 ms

meter.asp

meter.asp

209 ms

t.php

t.php

212 ms

collect

collect

174 ms

0

0

235 ms

ga.js

ga.js

170 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

33 ms

Icon%20Building%20Signage%20copy.jpg

Icon%20Building%20Signage%20copy.jpg

3893 ms

Icon%20Project%20%26%20Custom%20booth.jpg

Icon%20Project%20%26%20Custom%20booth.jpg

4067 ms

box_bottom_left.png

box_bottom_left.png

3828 ms

box_bottom_right.png

box_bottom_right.png

3833 ms

block_left_header_right_bg.png

block_left_header_right_bg.png

3843 ms

bannerpacer.gif

bannerpacer.gif

5528 ms

brochure-pacer-icon.gif

brochure-pacer-icon.gif

4452 ms

brochure.png

brochure.png

3913 ms

FTP%20Transfer.png

FTP%20Transfer.png

3977 ms

Omnitapps-Free-Download-button.png

Omnitapps-Free-Download-button.png

4105 ms

box_top_left.png

box_top_left.png

3924 ms

block_right_header_bg.png

block_right_header_bg.png

3907 ms

sellbindo.jpg

sellbindo.jpg

4537 ms

kfc_1.jpg

kfc_1.jpg

4368 ms

permata_0.jpg

permata_0.jpg

4175 ms

mkg_1.jpg

mkg_1.jpg

3899 ms

the%20east_0.jpg

the%20east_0.jpg

4124 ms

mandiri_0.jpg

mandiri_0.jpg

4406 ms

main_bottom_edge.png

main_bottom_edge.png

3838 ms

footer_header_bg.png

footer_header_bg.png

3907 ms

list_arrow.png

list_arrow.png

3785 ms

logo%20fb.png

logo%20fb.png

4427 ms

logo%20youtube.png

logo%20youtube.png

4105 ms

google%20maps%20ISG.jpg

google%20maps%20ISG.jpg

3391 ms

pdf-icon.png

pdf-icon.png

3209 ms

btn-close.png

btn-close.png

3150 ms

banner-displaystore.png

banner-displaystore.png

3176 ms

btn_showhide.gif

btn_showhide.gif

2979 ms

scroll_left.png

scroll_left.png

2874 ms

scroll_right.png

scroll_right.png

2778 ms

Accessibility Review

innograph.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

innograph.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

innograph.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Innograph.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Innograph.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

innograph.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of InnoGRAPH. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: