Tools & Wizards About Us
innojar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

innojar.com

IT Solutions and Consulting | Enterprise Solutions for Businesses

Page Load Speed

8.9 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

972 ms

innojar.com screenshot

About Website

Visit innojar.com now to see the best up-to-date Innojar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about innojar.com

Discover how Innojar enhances the lives and success of business owners by providing enterprise IT solutions to businesses.

Visit innojar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Innojar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

innojar.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value740 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

innojar.com

1518 ms

www.innojar.com

1985 ms

main.css

1811 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1594 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Innojar.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Innojar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (55%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Innojar.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 95.5 kB

  • Original 107.8 kB
  • After minification 63.4 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 44.4 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 65.5 kB

  • Original 998.0 kB
  • After minification 932.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Innojar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 365.7 kB

  • Original 514.0 kB
  • After minification 459.9 kB
  • After compression 148.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 365.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 987.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 978.1 kB
  • After compression 149.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Innojar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 987.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (44%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Innojar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

innojar.com

innojar.com

1518 ms

www.innojar.com

www.innojar.com

1985 ms

main.css

main.css

1811 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1594 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

3 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

20 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

939 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

1439 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

1339 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

1776 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1211 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

1439 ms

aos.js

aos.js

1773 ms

app.js

app.js

1775 ms

swiper-bundle.min

swiper-bundle.min

1777 ms

js

js

67 ms

css2

css2

76 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

308 ms

logo.png

logo.png

275 ms

1.png

1.png

460 ms

circle-1.svg

circle-1.svg

274 ms

22_NoBG.png

22_NoBG.png

457 ms

6_NoBG.png

6_NoBG.png

273 ms

5-.png

5-.png

275 ms

quotes-left.svg

quotes-left.svg

460 ms

1.png

1.png

458 ms

9.png

9.png

678 ms

Yamaha.png

Yamaha.png

461 ms

1544613489.png

1544613489.png

682 ms

1544613541.png

1544613541.png

680 ms

1544613583.png

1544613583.png

683 ms

1544613637.png

1544613637.png

680 ms

1544614583.png

1544614583.png

686 ms

1544614402.png

1544614402.png

900 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

121 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

122 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

768 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1208 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

1023 ms

fa-thin-100.woff

fa-thin-100.woff

998 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

118 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

791 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

57 ms

js

js

107 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

136 ms

recorder.js

recorder.js

293 ms

js

js

149 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

collect

collect

36 ms

Accessibility Review

innojar.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

innojar.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

innojar.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Innojar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Innojar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

innojar.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Innojar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: