Tools & Wizards About Us
innolight.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

innolight.co.uk

Innolight – Electrical & Lighting Contractors Hertfordshire | London | South East

Page Load Speed

7.9 sec in total

First Response

2.5 sec

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

463 ms

innolight.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit innolight.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Innolight content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about innolight.co.uk

Visit innolight.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Innolight.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

innolight.co.uk performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

innolight.co.uk

2500 ms

style.min.css

371 ms

styles.css

375 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

389 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

372 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Innolight.co.uk, 22% (11 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Innolight.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 316.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Innolight.co.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 140.0 kB

  • Original 165.4 kB
  • After minification 165.2 kB
  • After compression 25.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 176.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Innolight needs image optimization as it can save up to 176.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 179 B

  • Original 178.6 kB
  • After minification 178.6 kB
  • After compression 178.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 577 B

  • Original 164.2 kB
  • After minification 164.2 kB
  • After compression 163.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Innolight.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (79%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Innolight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

innolight.co.uk

innolight.co.uk

2500 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

371 ms

styles.css

styles.css

375 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

389 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

372 ms

style.css

style.css

722 ms

style.css

style.css

525 ms

css

css

26 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

667 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

741 ms

css

css

38 ms

ultimate.min.css

ultimate.min.css

1133 ms

prettyPhoto.min.css

prettyPhoto.min.css

747 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1067 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1025 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

1186 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1095 ms

ultimate.min.js

ultimate.min.js

1107 ms

ultimate_bg.min.js

ultimate_bg.min.js

1384 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

903 ms

cookie-law-info-table.css

cookie-law-info-table.css

1307 ms

index.js

index.js

1308 ms

index.js

index.js

1309 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

1583 ms

script.js

script.js

1380 ms

twitter-widgets.js

twitter-widgets.js

1572 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1712 ms

innolight-logo.png

innolight-logo.png

403 ms

approved-accreditations.jpg

approved-accreditations.jpg

629 ms

dummy3.jpg

dummy3.jpg

786 ms

rev-01.jpg

rev-01.jpg

1167 ms

font

font

25 ms

font

font

47 ms

Defaults.woff

Defaults.woff

889 ms

font

font

114 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

913 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

94 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

109 ms

settings

settings

104 ms

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

24 ms

_innolight

_innolight

74 ms

polyfills-3b821eda8863adcc4a4b.js

polyfills-3b821eda8863adcc4a4b.js

24 ms

runtime-a697c5a1ae32bd7e4d42.js

runtime-a697c5a1ae32bd7e4d42.js

45 ms

modules.20f98d7498a59035a762.js

modules.20f98d7498a59035a762.js

87 ms

main-fd9ef5eb169057cda26d.js

main-fd9ef5eb169057cda26d.js

77 ms

_app-88bf420a57d49e33be53.js

_app-88bf420a57d49e33be53.js

89 ms

%5BscreenName%5D-c33f0b02841cffc3e9b4.js

%5BscreenName%5D-c33f0b02841cffc3e9b4.js

103 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

103 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

101 ms

Accessibility Review

innolight.co.uk accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

innolight.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

innolight.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Innolight.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Innolight.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

innolight.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Innolight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: