Tools & Wizards About Us
innomot.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

innomot.org

言わぬが花４

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

666 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

innomot.org screenshot

About Website

Visit innomot.org now to see the best up-to-date Innomot content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about innomot.org

Visit innomot.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Innomot.org page load time and found that the first response time was 666 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

innomot.org performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.innomot.org

666 ms

style.min.css

331 ms

style.css

337 ms

style.css

340 ms

forest.jpg

1184 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Innomot.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Innomot.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 90.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

381.6 kB

After Optimization

291.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Innomot.org main page is 381.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 243.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 88.6 kB

  • Original 116.3 kB
  • After minification 115.2 kB
  • After compression 27.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 243.3 kB
  • After minification 243.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Innomot images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 121 B

  • Original 396 B
  • After minification 396 B
  • After compression 275 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 121 B or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Innomot.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Innomot. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.innomot.org

www.innomot.org

666 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

331 ms

style.css

style.css

337 ms

style.css

style.css

340 ms

forest.jpg

forest.jpg

1184 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

270 ms

Accessibility Review

innomot.org accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

innomot.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

innomot.org SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Innomot.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Innomot.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

innomot.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Innomot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: