Tools & Wizards About Us
inphotograph.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

inphotograph.com

Northern Virginia Corporate Headshot Lifestyle Portrait Photography inPhotograph

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

963 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

73 ms

inphotograph.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing InPhotograph content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inphotograph.com

Photographer Jeff Mauritzen of inPhotograph studios offers photography services to the Northern Virginia and Washington, D.C. metro areas: corporate photography, commercial photography, corporate even...

Visit inphotograph.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inphotograph.com page load time and found that the first response time was 963 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inphotograph.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.inphotograph.com

963 ms

minified.js

36 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

35 ms

polyfill.min.js

110 ms

thunderbolt-commons.ec68bee9.bundle.min.js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Inphotograph.com, 45% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 36% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (963 ms) belongs to the original domain Inphotograph.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 594.2 kB (61%)

Content Size

967.8 kB

After Optimization

373.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Inphotograph.com main page is 967.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 733.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 590.8 kB

  • Original 733.3 kB
  • After minification 731.7 kB
  • After compression 142.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 590.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 672 B

  • Original 6.2 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, InPhotograph needs image optimization as it can save up to 672 B or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 228.3 kB
  • After minification 228.3 kB
  • After compression 225.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of InPhotograph. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.inphotograph.com

www.inphotograph.com

963 ms

minified.js

minified.js

36 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

35 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

110 ms

thunderbolt-commons.ec68bee9.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.ec68bee9.bundle.min.js

60 ms

main.f286c407.bundle.min.js

main.f286c407.bundle.min.js

59 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

59 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

56 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

58 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

56 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

59 ms

inphotograph-logo-black.png

inphotograph-logo-black.png

281 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

67 ms

adef56_ce1e3aa10ef84553a40366b1c14016ff~mv2.jpg

adef56_ce1e3aa10ef84553a40366b1c14016ff~mv2.jpg

212 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

11 ms

aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

11 ms

9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

4 ms

46 ms

24 ms

28 ms

28 ms

26 ms

25 ms

68 ms

66 ms

71 ms

71 ms

71 ms

88 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

7 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

28 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

12 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

10 ms

Accessibility Review

inphotograph.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

inphotograph.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

inphotograph.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inphotograph.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inphotograph.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inphotograph.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of InPhotograph. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: