Tools & Wizards About Us
inpin.top screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

inpin.top

恭喜，站点创建成功！

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

658 ms

Resources Loaded

674 ms

Page Rendered

70 ms

inpin.top screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Inpin content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inpin.top

Visit inpin.top

Key Findings

We analyzed Inpin.top page load time and found that the first response time was 658 ms and then it took 744 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inpin.top performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inpin.top

658 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Inpin.top and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (658 ms) belongs to the original domain Inpin.top.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 170.6 kB (4%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inpin.top main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 396 B

  • Original 918 B
  • After minification 829 B
  • After compression 522 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 396 B or 43% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 134.4 kB

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 4.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inpin images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

  • Original 185.5 kB
  • After minification 185.4 kB
  • After compression 162.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 298.9 kB
  • After minification 298.9 kB
  • After compression 286.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inpin.top has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Network Requests Diagram

inpin.top

inpin.top

658 ms

Accessibility Review

inpin.top accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

inpin.top best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

inpin.top SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inpin.top can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Inpin.top main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inpin.top

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inpin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: