Tools & Wizards About Us
inpractise.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

inpractise.com

Quality Primary Research on Quality Companies | Explore the library | In Practise

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

642 ms

Page Rendered

701 ms

inpractise.com screenshot

About Website

Visit inpractise.com now to see the best up-to-date In Practise content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inpractise.com

Hundreds of executive interviews on quality companies. New interviews every week. Explore our library and our invaluable community of investors and partners.

Visit inpractise.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inpractise.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inpractise.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,160 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.107

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inpractise.com

52 ms

inpractise.com

70 ms

gtm.js

173 ms

js

246 ms

751b797678530fcf.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Inpractise.com, 23% (16 requests) were made to Embed-cdn.spotifycdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (246 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 264.1 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

920.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inpractise.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 513.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 172.4 kB

  • Original 237.5 kB
  • After minification 237.4 kB
  • After compression 65.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 172.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 91.3 kB

  • Original 421.6 kB
  • After minification 330.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, In Practise needs image optimization as it can save up to 91.3 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 281 B

  • Original 513.1 kB
  • After minification 513.1 kB
  • After compression 512.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 41 B

  • Original 12.4 kB
  • After minification 12.4 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inpractise.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (76%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In Practise. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inpractise.com

inpractise.com

52 ms

inpractise.com

inpractise.com

70 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

173 ms

js

js

246 ms

751b797678530fcf.css

751b797678530fcf.css

27 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

37 ms

7802.bfec8e5f56826efe.js

7802.bfec8e5f56826efe.js

37 ms

9041-68a8ee58869dad71.js

9041-68a8ee58869dad71.js

37 ms

1537-6cb604e6228865aa.js

1537-6cb604e6228865aa.js

36 ms

199.2b86d96755043a1e.js

199.2b86d96755043a1e.js

39 ms

8255.55e387a25cc1ec10.js

8255.55e387a25cc1ec10.js

37 ms

ff239f9d-df3e9ce31558165f.js

ff239f9d-df3e9ce31558165f.js

45 ms

9433-ac1500fd19e907ba.js

9433-ac1500fd19e907ba.js

47 ms

1093-dfdf53525ed31b90.js

1093-dfdf53525ed31b90.js

49 ms

1215-213143e8498075b6.js

1215-213143e8498075b6.js

46 ms

7091.ef2c54831622917f.js

7091.ef2c54831622917f.js

47 ms

webpack-3cfc5bc5304f0109.js

webpack-3cfc5bc5304f0109.js

47 ms

framework-98727615ca6d873c.js

framework-98727615ca6d873c.js

89 ms

main-81ecc6897be4b163.js

main-81ecc6897be4b163.js

87 ms

_app-1ba5e9887bfde75a.js

_app-1ba5e9887bfde75a.js

91 ms

41155975-0250c0a05b4da56e.js

41155975-0250c0a05b4da56e.js

88 ms

ebc70433-9b882b5ddd0e95b5.js

ebc70433-9b882b5ddd0e95b5.js

94 ms

fea29d9f-33598a58abfef440.js

fea29d9f-33598a58abfef440.js

93 ms

e21e5bbe-c78632813d99c260.js

e21e5bbe-c78632813d99c260.js

91 ms

2e3a845b-251a0f8b712e2e32.js

2e3a845b-251a0f8b712e2e32.js

94 ms

29107295-4a69275373f23f88.js

29107295-4a69275373f23f88.js

89 ms

6eb5140f-5ccfa8f4a0278c82.js

6eb5140f-5ccfa8f4a0278c82.js

95 ms

5d416436-f04f37c3109e5d92.js

5d416436-f04f37c3109e5d92.js

94 ms

209-c1da3e0a2a6a68b5.js

209-c1da3e0a2a6a68b5.js

94 ms

7147-059366c2b022ace9.js

7147-059366c2b022ace9.js

96 ms

5936-334a743285c54be2.js

5936-334a743285c54be2.js

96 ms

8376-726b5b20df7c0343.js

8376-726b5b20df7c0343.js

95 ms

index-e7c43bdfd583b451.js

index-e7c43bdfd583b451.js

96 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

166 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

168 ms

css2

css2

43 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

90 ms

0W6vEHSx9XxPrya0zko7mi

0W6vEHSx9XxPrya0zko7mi

161 ms

logo-white.svg

logo-white.svg

83 ms

logo-blue.svg

logo-blue.svg

84 ms

icon-white.svg

icon-white.svg

87 ms

icon-blue.svg

icon-blue.svg

86 ms

network-white-w500-h300.png

network-white-w500-h300.png

113 ms

inpractise-team-structure-2.png

inpractise-team-structure-2.png

115 ms

elliot-j-turner.jpg

elliot-j-turner.jpg

117 ms

christopher-mayer.jpeg

christopher-mayer.jpeg

114 ms

stephane-rueff.jpg

stephane-rueff.jpg

115 ms

network-white-w1000-h1000.png

network-white-w1000-h1000.png

111 ms

philip-green.jpg

philip-green.jpg

118 ms

logo-white.svg

logo-white.svg

121 ms

fd67e1fb69fabcc3.css

fd67e1fb69fabcc3.css

134 ms

e4498accf0d627f0.css

e4498accf0d627f0.css

135 ms

c6975c1d3bf62553.css

c6975c1d3bf62553.css

139 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

152 ms

webpack-6080b30e01e22dba.js

webpack-6080b30e01e22dba.js

152 ms

framework-49caf3a49676fd42.js

framework-49caf3a49676fd42.js

152 ms

main-9daad4dd8b0f357a.js

main-9daad4dd8b0f357a.js

152 ms

_app-8c9c24e01786712e.js

_app-8c9c24e01786712e.js

184 ms

fec483df-87a6891f9916661b.js

fec483df-87a6891f9916661b.js

184 ms

370d8c6a-ba7b9fa33b972102.js

370d8c6a-ba7b9fa33b972102.js

200 ms

2049-d86aae427e069478.js

2049-d86aae427e069478.js

208 ms

7409-5ea0306bb3203d2b.js

7409-5ea0306bb3203d2b.js

205 ms

7854-41dbc1a457374f86.js

7854-41dbc1a457374f86.js

198 ms

%5Bid%5D-9f0618203d4dbff8.js

%5Bid%5D-9f0618203d4dbff8.js

206 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

206 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

205 ms

font

font

88 ms

font

font

120 ms

beacon-v2.helpscout.net

beacon-v2.helpscout.net

50 ms

Accessibility Review

inpractise.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

inpractise.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

inpractise.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inpractise.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inpractise.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inpractise.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of In Practise. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: