6.8 sec in total
497 ms
6 sec
258 ms
Welcome to insafety.org homepage info - get ready to check Insafety best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about insafety.org
?????? ????? ?? ?????? ? ????. ????? ???????????? ?????. ??????????? ??????? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ?????? ? ????
Visit insafety.orgWe analyzed Insafety.org page load time and found that the first response time was 497 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
insafety.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
497 ms
548 ms
150 ms
423 ms
387 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Insafety.org, 1% (1 request) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Insafety.org.
Page size can be reduced by 173.7 kB (12%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Insafety.org main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Insafety images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Insafety.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.8 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (47%)
83
44
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Insafety. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
insafety.org
497 ms
insafety.org
548 ms
fonts.css
150 ms
bootstrap.css
423 ms
font-awesome.css
387 ms
simple-line-icons.css
390 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
384 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
389 ms
magnific-popup.css
390 ms
theme.css
531 ms
theme-elements.css
657 ms
theme-blog.css
534 ms
theme-shop.css
540 ms
theme-animate.css
541 ms
settings.css
561 ms
layers.css
673 ms
navigation.css
676 ms
component.css
690 ms
default.css
693 ms
custom.css
709 ms
modernizr.js
1246 ms
verify.js
1249 ms
jquery.js
1419 ms
jquery.appear.js
1248 ms
jquery.easing.js
1248 ms
jquery-cookie.js
1252 ms
bootstrap.js
1500 ms
common.js
1505 ms
jquery.validation.js
1418 ms
jquery.stellar.js
1418 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.js
1417 ms
jquery.gmap.js
1511 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
1529 ms
jquery.isotope.js
1536 ms
owl.carousel.js
1535 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
1635 ms
vide.js
1630 ms
theme.js
1638 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1655 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1306 ms
jquery.flipshow.js
1302 ms
view.home.js
1380 ms
theme.init.js
1384 ms
logo.png
745 ms
slide-title-border.png
745 ms
mockup.png
796 ms
top.png
746 ms
krung.jpg
747 ms
mosplitka.jpg
747 ms
e1.jpg
748 ms
ngs.jpg
748 ms
fontanka.jpg
796 ms
kasko2.png
796 ms
akson.jpg
807 ms
baikal.jpg
847 ms
b24_2.jpg
847 ms
b24_1.jpg
892 ms
logo-1.png
897 ms
logo-2.png
910 ms
logo-3.png
917 ms
logo-4.png
828 ms
logo-5.png
826 ms
logo-2-1.png
860 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2161 ms
logo-3_11.png
1798 ms
logo-2-2.png
1788 ms
logo-3_33.png
1899 ms
logo-3_22.png
1892 ms
logo-2-4.png
1761 ms
logo-6.png
1883 ms
logo-11.png
1921 ms
logo-8.png
1919 ms
logo-10.png
1907 ms
logo-9.png
1869 ms
logo-12.png
1877 ms
logo-7.png
2677 ms
logo-18.png
2562 ms
logo-14.png
2550 ms
watch.js
161 ms
revicons.woff
2386 ms
logo-15.png
2443 ms
logo-16.png
2320 ms
logo-19.png
2452 ms
logo-17.png
2461 ms
hack1.jpg
2953 ms
hack2.jpg
2752 ms
hack3.jpg
2812 ms
arrows-dark.png
2523 ms
insafety.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
insafety.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
insafety.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Insafety.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Insafety.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
insafety.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Insafety. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: