Tools & Wizards About Us
insecuritiesproject.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

insecuritiesproject.com

#1 Promotional Items Printing Denver, CO | Corporate Giveaways Near Me

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

254 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

921 ms

insecuritiesproject.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to insecuritiesproject.com homepage info - get ready to check Insecuritiesproject best content right away, or after learning these important things about insecuritiesproject.com

If you're looking for the best provider of promotional items for your business or organization, we can help you! Our Denver printing company uses premium materials and provides expert Promotional...

Visit insecuritiesproject.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Insecuritiesproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 254 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

insecuritiesproject.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,920 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.195

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

insecuritiesproject.com

254 ms

197 ms

css

77 ms

jquery.min.js

65 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Insecuritiesproject.com, 84% (43 requests) were made to Denverprintingservices.net and 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Denverprintingservices.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 278.8 kB (36%)

Content Size

770.3 kB

After Optimization

491.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Insecuritiesproject.com main page is 770.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 425.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 239.6 kB

  • Original 290.7 kB
  • After minification 285.7 kB
  • After compression 51.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 239.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 425.8 kB
  • After minification 418.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Insecuritiesproject images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 53.8 kB
  • After minification 53.8 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (71%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Insecuritiesproject. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

insecuritiesproject.com

insecuritiesproject.com

254 ms

197 ms

css

css

77 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

65 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

63 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

184 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

245 ms

js

js

278 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

244 ms

index.php

index.php

1428 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

241 ms

global.js

global.js

240 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

239 ms

jquery.fittext.js

jquery.fittext.js

239 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

241 ms

jquery.cycle2.js

jquery.cycle2.js

242 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

243 ms

ouibounce.js

ouibounce.js

243 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

246 ms

frm.min.js

frm.min.js

242 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

245 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

253 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

198 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

113 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

119 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

134 ms

ouibounce.min.css

ouibounce.min.css

190 ms

style.css

style.css

235 ms

sign-company.jpg

sign-company.jpg

188 ms

IMG_0490-promotional-items-client-300x225.jpg

IMG_0490-promotional-items-client-300x225.jpg

245 ms

IMG_20190318_073833-client-300x225.jpg

IMG_20190318_073833-client-300x225.jpg

244 ms

Custom-engraved-corkscrew-bottle-opener-with-logo-or-artwork__41071.1498500961__51228-300x300.jpg

Custom-engraved-corkscrew-bottle-opener-with-logo-or-artwork__41071.1498500961__51228-300x300.jpg

247 ms

IMG_20190416_140156-client-225x300.jpg

IMG_20190416_140156-client-225x300.jpg

248 ms

IMG_0751-medals-bottles-visors-client-225x300.jpg

IMG_0751-medals-bottles-visors-client-225x300.jpg

247 ms

IMG_0486-client-300x135.jpg

IMG_0486-client-300x135.jpg

282 ms

rpm-circle-logo.png

rpm-circle-logo.png

347 ms

rpm-circle-logo-sm.png

rpm-circle-logo-sm.png

137 ms

IMG_1664-300x225.jpg

IMG_1664-300x225.jpg

137 ms

arrow1.png

arrow1.png

122 ms

rpm-circle-logo.png

rpm-circle-logo.png

140 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

95 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

44 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

style.css

style.css

122 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

103 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

35 ms

index.php

index.php

287 ms

www.denverprintingservices.net

www.denverprintingservices.net

242 ms

none.png

none.png

364 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

146 ms

Accessibility Review

insecuritiesproject.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best Practices

insecuritiesproject.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

insecuritiesproject.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Insecuritiesproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Insecuritiesproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

insecuritiesproject.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Insecuritiesproject. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: