Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

insigma.com

Your IT service provider for cloud-based software - INSIGMA IT

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

303 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

131 ms

insigma.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to insigma.com homepage info - get ready to check INSIGMA best content right away, or after learning these important things about insigma.com

We are your contact for the individual development of cloud-based software, IT solutions and IT services in the Cologne area.

Visit insigma.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Insigma.com page load time and found that the first response time was 303 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

insigma.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,940 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

insigma.com

303 ms

en

729 ms

ffa881a9ff.css

93 ms

e9e07c5ca0.js

182 ms

vhs-assets-filercss-slickcss.css

273 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Insigma.com, 97% (31 requests) were made to Insigma.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (729 ms) relates to the external source Insigma.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.5 kB (11%)

Content Size

230.5 kB

After Optimization

205.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Insigma.com main page is 230.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 209.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 19.8 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 209.5 kB
  • After minification 200.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INSIGMA images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (62%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INSIGMA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

insigma.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

insigma.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

insigma.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Insigma.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Insigma.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INSIGMA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: