Tools & Wizards About Us
insigniacom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

insigniacom.com

Medical Healthcare Marketing Advertising Agency Company Communications Creative

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

254 ms

insigniacom.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Insigniacom content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about insigniacom.com

Awarded medical and healthcare marketing, media, communications and creative advertising agency in India to worldwide companies and agencies since 2009 for right audience ads of health care industry w...

Visit insigniacom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Insigniacom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

insigniacom.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

insigniacom.com

172 ms

base.css

110 ms

skeleton.css

63 ms

layout.css

129 ms

child.css

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (116 requests) were addressed to the original Insigniacom.com, 4% (5 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (558 ms) belongs to the original domain Insigniacom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 549.6 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Insigniacom.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 29.8 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.8 kB, which is 46% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 247.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Insigniacom needs image optimization as it can save up to 247.9 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 121.4 kB

  • Original 171.6 kB
  • After minification 154.1 kB
  • After compression 50.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 121.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 154.6 kB

  • Original 178.8 kB
  • After minification 156.8 kB
  • After compression 24.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Insigniacom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 154.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (12%)

Requests Now

109

After Optimization

96

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 109 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Insigniacom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

insigniacom.com

insigniacom.com

172 ms

base.css

base.css

110 ms

skeleton.css

skeleton.css

63 ms

layout.css

layout.css

129 ms

child.css

child.css

81 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

135 ms

jquery.onebyone.css

jquery.onebyone.css

104 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

117 ms

jquery-1-8-2.js

jquery-1-8-2.js

219 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

163 ms

jquery.carousel.js

jquery.carousel.js

163 ms

jquery.color.animation.js

jquery.color.animation.js

177 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

212 ms

default.js

default.js

247 ms

jquery.onebyone.min.js

jquery.onebyone.min.js

216 ms

jquery.touchwipe.min.js

jquery.touchwipe.min.js

249 ms

colorpicker.css

colorpicker.css

249 ms

colorpicker.js

colorpicker.js

264 ms

insigniacom.com

insigniacom.com

302 ms

typeofjobs.html

typeofjobs.html

78 ms

diag-lines-light.png

diag-lines-light.png

81 ms

noise-lowest.png

noise-lowest.png

88 ms

background-1.jpg

background-1.jpg

77 ms

slug-noise.png

slug-noise.png

95 ms

slug-crop.png

slug-crop.png

93 ms

nav-960.png

nav-960.png

109 ms

logo.png

logo.png

156 ms

header-dividers.png

header-dividers.png

149 ms

logoMINI.png

logoMINI.png

150 ms

nav-shadow-960.png

nav-shadow-960.png

152 ms

button-slider.png

button-slider.png

158 ms

07.png

07.png

174 ms

08.png

08.png

211 ms

06.png

06.png

205 ms

05.png

05.png

218 ms

04.png

04.png

211 ms

03.png

03.png

212 ms

02.png

02.png

230 ms

01.png

01.png

259 ms

Insignia-revolving-logo-85X85.gif

Insignia-revolving-logo-85X85.gif

360 ms

banner1-c.png

banner1-c.png

282 ms

banner1-b.png

banner1-b.png

337 ms

banner1-a.png

banner1-a.png

334 ms

banner2-c.png

banner2-c.png

312 ms

banner2-b.png

banner2-b.png

340 ms

banner2-a.png

banner2-a.png

389 ms

banner3-a.png

banner3-a.png

444 ms

banner3-b.png

banner3-b.png

440 ms

banner3-c.png

banner3-c.png

394 ms

banner4-c.png

banner4-c.png

432 ms

banner4-b.png

banner4-b.png

464 ms

banner4-a.png

banner4-a.png

522 ms

banner5-c.png

banner5-c.png

449 ms

banner5-b.png

banner5-b.png

516 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

6 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

9 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

14 ms

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff

15 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxn5HxGBcBvicCpTp6spHfNo.woff

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxn5HxGBcBvicCpTp6spHfNo.woff

14 ms

banner5-a.png

banner5-a.png

521 ms

banner6-c.png

banner6-c.png

472 ms

banner6-b.png

banner6-b.png

483 ms

banner6-a.png

banner6-a.png

499 ms

banner7-c.png

banner7-c.png

495 ms

banner7-b.png

banner7-b.png

520 ms

banner7-a.png

banner7-a.png

558 ms

bodyTop-960.png

bodyTop-960.png

506 ms

body-960.png

body-960.png

483 ms

side-shadows-960.png

side-shadows-960.png

483 ms

callout.png

callout.png

485 ms

diag-hr.png

diag-hr.png

522 ms

footer-grain-light.png

footer-grain-light.png

510 ms

footer-style2-stitch.png

footer-style2-stitch.png

511 ms

footer-grain.png

footer-grain.png

507 ms

footer-2-patch.png

footer-2-patch.png

479 ms

frb-960.png

frb-960.png

495 ms

footer-style2-logo.png

footer-style2-logo.png

510 ms

footer-ct.png

footer-ct.png

514 ms

twitter-bird-dark-bgs.png

twitter-bird-dark-bgs.png

505 ms

cbutton-denim-blue-cut.png

cbutton-denim-blue-cut.png

487 ms

cbutton-denim-blue.png

cbutton-denim-blue.png

486 ms

footer-divider.png

footer-divider.png

464 ms

icon-facebook.png

icon-facebook.png

488 ms

icon-twitter.png

icon-twitter.png

488 ms

icon-linkedin.png

icon-linkedin.png

480 ms

icon-facebook-hover.png

icon-facebook-hover.png

465 ms

icon-twitter-hover.png

icon-twitter-hover.png

437 ms

icon-linkedin-hover.png

icon-linkedin-hover.png

434 ms

01.png

01.png

450 ms

02.png

02.png

444 ms

03.png

03.png

434 ms

04.png

04.png

430 ms

05.png

05.png

417 ms

06.png

06.png

362 ms

07.png

07.png

406 ms

08.png

08.png

393 ms

09.png

09.png

379 ms

10.png

10.png

363 ms

11.png

11.png

362 ms

12.png

12.png

360 ms

13.png

13.png

378 ms

14.png

14.png

377 ms

15.png

15.png

364 ms

16.png

16.png

364 ms

17.png

17.png

361 ms

18.png

18.png

345 ms

19.png

19.png

376 ms

20.png

20.png

371 ms

21.png

21.png

364 ms

22.png

22.png

360 ms

23.png

23.png

344 ms

24.png

24.png

339 ms

25.png

25.png

396 ms

26.png

26.png

371 ms

27.png

27.png

365 ms

28.png

28.png

356 ms

29.png

29.png

336 ms

background-2.jpg

background-2.jpg

28 ms

bullets.png

bullets.png

73 ms

prev.png

prev.png

54 ms

next.png

next.png

55 ms

Accessibility Review

insigniacom.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

insigniacom.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

insigniacom.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Insigniacom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Insigniacom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

insigniacom.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Insigniacom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: