3.5 sec in total
253 ms
3.1 sec
176 ms
Visit insitetechnical.com now to see the best up-to-date In Site Technical content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about insitetechnical.com
InSite are a highly skilled and experienced Engineering Design, Consultancy and Project Management Team in the Energy Sector who can support you from concept to commissioning.
Visit insitetechnical.comWe analyzed Insitetechnical.com page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
insitetechnical.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value18.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
4/100
10%
Value2,510 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.431
22/100
15%
Value17.6 s
4/100
10%
253 ms
467 ms
158 ms
305 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Insitetechnical.com, 50% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (579 ms) belongs to the original domain Insitetechnical.com.
Page size can be reduced by 76.2 kB (6%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Insitetechnical.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 711.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. In Site Technical images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Insitetechnical.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (35%)
26
17
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In Site Technical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
insitetechnical.com
253 ms
www.insitetechnical.com
467 ms
autoptimize_415ca7ec0ba78471445b7a1a59cd583e.css
158 ms
jquery.min.js
305 ms
js
58 ms
autoptimize_154f3a3ef3dd7cfe54caa110c13f0b60.js
384 ms
logo2.png
97 ms
zi_E2F4vGS0
160 ms
Homepage_Icon_Technical.png
172 ms
Homepage_Icon-Operational.png
269 ms
Homepage_Icon_Project.png
289 ms
VULCAIN_logotype_BLANC_RVB_fond_transparent-1024x363.png
136 ms
SWWSG-logo-APPROVED-1024x372.jpg
204 ms
cyber_105.png
137 ms
cyberplus_105.png
210 ms
js
103 ms
analytics.js
137 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff
123 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
160 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff
160 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
159 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff
158 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
158 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrc.woff
158 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
160 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrc.woff
161 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
162 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff
162 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
162 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff
158 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
162 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff
163 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
164 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff
163 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
165 ms
modules.woff
267 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
162 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
164 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
164 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
165 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff
166 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
166 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
168 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
165 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff
167 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
168 ms
InSite-Technical-Services-Ltd_Home-Page-Banner_Final_11102021_r1.jpg
579 ms
zi_E2F4vGS0
133 ms
collect
38 ms
www-player.css
5 ms
www-embed-player.js
30 ms
base.js
57 ms
ad_status.js
169 ms
6mt_jkCC8QEMfVv4UaXe0WVRezbgElH9_VSMBGBwk28.js
123 ms
embed.js
40 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
35 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
34 ms
autoptimize_ed87e6fc5b520cbb909790129bcf475a.css
147 ms
id
33 ms
Create
101 ms
insitetechnical.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
insitetechnical.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
insitetechnical.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Insitetechnical.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Insitetechnical.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
insitetechnical.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of In Site Technical. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: