Tools & Wizards About Us
inspectietechniek.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

inspectietechniek.com

Niet destructief onderzoek (NDO) - Inspectietechniek.com

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

299 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

176 ms

inspectietechniek.com screenshot

About Website

Visit inspectietechniek.com now to see the best up-to-date Inspectietechniek content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inspectietechniek.com

Niet destructief onderzoek omvat inspectietechnieken, zoals het meten of detecteren van materiaaldikte, scheuren, lasonderzoek of ultrasoon onderzoek.

Visit inspectietechniek.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inspectietechniek.com page load time and found that the first response time was 299 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inspectietechniek.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,560 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inspectietechniek.com

299 ms

www.inspectietechniek.com

983 ms

styles.css

265 ms

style.css

283 ms

toolbar.css

293 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Inspectietechniek.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (983 ms) belongs to the original domain Inspectietechniek.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (49%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inspectietechniek.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 245.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 20.3 kB

  • Original 348.4 kB
  • After minification 328.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inspectietechniek images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 952.0 kB
  • After minification 952.0 kB
  • After compression 949.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 99.3 kB
  • After minification 99.3 kB
  • After compression 95.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inspectietechniek.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (84%)

Requests Now

97

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inspectietechniek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 71 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inspectietechniek.com

inspectietechniek.com

299 ms

www.inspectietechniek.com

www.inspectietechniek.com

983 ms

styles.css

styles.css

265 ms

style.css

style.css

283 ms

toolbar.css

toolbar.css

293 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

cookieblocker.min.css

294 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

294 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

357 ms

style.css

style.css

378 ms

modern.css

modern.css

379 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

484 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

386 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

542 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

713 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

475 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

495 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

563 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

566 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

581 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

580 ms

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

709 ms

js

js

64 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

245 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

303 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

246 ms

index.js

index.js

246 ms

index.js

index.js

269 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

321 ms

element.js

element.js

57 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

321 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

332 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

332 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

341 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

485 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

384 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

390 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

400 ms

dom.min.js

dom.min.js

408 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

439 ms

escape-html.min.js

escape-html.min.js

478 ms

element.min.js

element.min.js

502 ms

is-shallow-equal.min.js

is-shallow-equal.min.js

503 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

504 ms

keycodes.min.js

keycodes.min.js

528 ms

priority-queue.min.js

priority-queue.min.js

573 ms

compose.min.js

compose.min.js

578 ms

private-apis.min.js

private-apis.min.js

575 ms

redux-routine.min.js

redux-routine.min.js

590 ms

api.js

api.js

48 ms

js

js

87 ms

data.min.js

data.min.js

600 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

620 ms

wc-blocks-registry.js

wc-blocks-registry.js

646 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

646 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

585 ms

wc-settings.js

wc-settings.js

593 ms

data-controls.min.js

data-controls.min.js

604 ms

html-entities.min.js

html-entities.min.js

602 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

124 ms

notices.min.js

notices.min.js

528 ms

wc-blocks-middleware.js

wc-blocks-middleware.js

525 ms

wc-blocks-data.js

wc-blocks-data.js

530 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

540 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

554 ms

primitives.min.js

primitives.min.js

558 ms

warning.min.js

warning.min.js

590 ms

blocks-components.js

blocks-components.js

557 ms

blocks-checkout.js

blocks-checkout.js

560 ms

order-attribution-blocks.min.js

order-attribution-blocks.min.js

550 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

563 ms

index.js

index.js

559 ms

index.js

index.js

616 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

592 ms

migrate.min.js

migrate.min.js

583 ms

search.min.js

search.min.js

580 ms

030b086e4dec23c7e021d90ed3c4282e.min.js

030b086e4dec23c7e021d90ed3c4282e.min.js

852 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

745 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

563 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

566 ms

NDT-Benelux.png

NDT-Benelux.png

578 ms

adviesenservice2.png

adviesenservice2.png

578 ms

Inspectietechniek-home-diktemeters.png

Inspectietechniek-home-diktemeters.png

629 ms

oppervlaktetechniek.png

oppervlaktetechniek.png

725 ms

verlaagdiktemeters.png

verlaagdiktemeters.png

592 ms

Inspectietechniek-home-hardheidmeters.png

Inspectietechniek-home-hardheidmeters.png

597 ms

ultrasoon-onderzoeks-apparatuur.png

ultrasoon-onderzoeks-apparatuur.png

756 ms

Benelux-NDT-DULOGO-300x202.png

Benelux-NDT-DULOGO-300x202.png

725 ms

Benelux-NDT-DeFelsko-300x202.png

Benelux-NDT-DeFelsko-300x202.png

713 ms

Benelux-NDT-Sonatest-250x202.png

Benelux-NDT-Sonatest-250x202.png

684 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

25 ms

anchor

anchor

122 ms

flags.png

flags.png

146 ms

js

js

69 ms

js

js

34 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

103 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

51 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

62 ms

UebCYnqdbF9ngI7DuCagEaT4xpR4mAb5pwZcsRDRe9I.js

UebCYnqdbF9ngI7DuCagEaT4xpR4mAb5pwZcsRDRe9I.js

53 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

50 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

40 ms

collect

collect

56 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

42 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

47 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

50 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

31 ms

Accessibility Review

inspectietechniek.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

inspectietechniek.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

inspectietechniek.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inspectietechniek.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inspectietechniek.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inspectietechniek.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Inspectietechniek. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: