Tools & Wizards About Us
instacks.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

instacks.in

testing

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

196 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

135 ms

instacks.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to instacks.in homepage info - get ready to check Instacks best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about instacks.in

testing

Visit instacks.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Instacks.in page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

instacks.in performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,570 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.081

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

instacks.in

196 ms

instacks.co

408 ms

css

67 ms

all.css

75 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Instacks.in, 51% (21 requests) were made to Instacks.co and 7% (3 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Demo.proctoring.online.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.2 kB (28%)

Content Size

312.0 kB

After Optimization

224.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Instacks.in main page is 312.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 177.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 64.5 kB

  • Original 77.8 kB
  • After minification 76.8 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 177.6 kB
  • After minification 177.6 kB
  • After compression 157.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 56.7 kB
  • After minification 56.7 kB
  • After compression 53.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Instacks.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (94%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Instacks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

instacks.in

instacks.in

196 ms

instacks.co

instacks.co

408 ms

css

css

67 ms

all.css

all.css

75 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

55 ms

style.scss

style.scss

99 ms

line.css

line.css

83 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

301 ms

style.css

style.css

389 ms

default.css

default.css

289 ms

flatpicker.css

flatpicker.css

290 ms

materialdesignicons.min.css

materialdesignicons.min.css

396 ms

plyr.css

plyr.css

291 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

32 ms

tex-mml-chtml.js

tex-mml-chtml.js

68 ms

js

js

99 ms

js

js

155 ms

styles.7bd4060a449e9f571844.css

styles.7bd4060a449e9f571844.css

769 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

94 ms

player.js

player.js

83 ms

checkout.js

checkout.js

1135 ms

supervisor.js

supervisor.js

1330 ms

ace.js

ace.js

680 ms

feather-icons

feather-icons

62 ms

runtime-es2015.7dbfe14c5aad62e2cb6c.js

runtime-es2015.7dbfe14c5aad62e2cb6c.js

391 ms

runtime-es5.7dbfe14c5aad62e2cb6c.js

runtime-es5.7dbfe14c5aad62e2cb6c.js

404 ms

polyfills-es5.775c47c72b3adc1e513f.js

polyfills-es5.775c47c72b3adc1e513f.js

591 ms

polyfills-es2015.aa74eb7c80e33db4c40e.js

polyfills-es2015.aa74eb7c80e33db4c40e.js

488 ms

scripts.a72f3e5601aba20789ee.js

scripts.a72f3e5601aba20789ee.js

888 ms

main-es2015.d04f920e2ff3364fe5c8.js

main-es2015.d04f920e2ff3364fe5c8.js

886 ms

main-es5.d04f920e2ff3364fe5c8.js

main-es5.d04f920e2ff3364fe5c8.js

981 ms

feather-icons@4.29.2

feather-icons@4.29.2

18 ms

feather.min.js

feather.min.js

15 ms

css

css

17 ms

l.js

l.js

42 ms

client.js

client.js

14 ms

client_default.css

client_default.css

25 ms

0-es5.571913a8871b33fdda08.js

0-es5.571913a8871b33fdda08.js

150 ms

1-es5.5bc9d304a5824fa3bd7a.js

1-es5.5bc9d304a5824fa3bd7a.js

300 ms

3-es5.95ff63d62e0ad7e062a8.js

3-es5.95ff63d62e0ad7e062a8.js

307 ms

17-es5.b780c98717e07bb696d8.js

17-es5.b780c98717e07bb696d8.js

307 ms

Accessibility Review

instacks.in accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

instacks.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

instacks.in SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Instacks.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Instacks.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

instacks.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: