Tools & Wizards About Us
instagiffer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

instagiffer.com

Instagiffer GIF Maker - From Video To GIF (Mac and PC)

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

226 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

456 ms

instagiffer.com screenshot

About Website

Visit instagiffer.com now to see the best up-to-date Instagiffer content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about instagiffer.com

Since 2013, Instagiffer has been helping thousands of people create animated GIFs from YouTube, HD video files, Vine, Netflix, Kodi, game streams, and more. Unlike most GIF tools, you can open video.....

Visit instagiffer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Instagiffer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 226 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

instagiffer.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.697

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

instagiffer.com

226 ms

pre_tumblelog.js

10 ms

reset.css

8 ms

tumblelog_post_message_queue.js

19 ms

stylesheet.css

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Instagiffer.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Assets.tumblr.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to I58.tinypic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (904 ms) relates to the external source I61.tinypic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 733.1 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

772.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Instagiffer.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 709.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 74.6 kB

  • Original 90.1 kB
  • After minification 74.1 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 461.2 kB
  • After minification 456.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Instagiffer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 450.9 kB

  • Original 709.4 kB
  • After minification 709.4 kB
  • After compression 258.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 450.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 203.0 kB

  • Original 244.7 kB
  • After minification 244.4 kB
  • After compression 41.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Instagiffer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 203.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (35%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

36

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Instagiffer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

instagiffer.com

instagiffer.com

226 ms

pre_tumblelog.js

pre_tumblelog.js

10 ms

reset.css

reset.css

8 ms

tumblelog_post_message_queue.js

tumblelog_post_message_queue.js

19 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

20 ms

tweets.js

tweets.js

319 ms

index.js

index.js

39 ms

all.js

all.js

299 ms

avatar_2f5a871f0b83_64.png

avatar_2f5a871f0b83_64.png

66 ms

icons_sprite.png

icons_sprite.png

20 ms

like_iframe.html

like_iframe.html

25 ms

fjp8p4.jpg

fjp8p4.jpg

283 ms

16biwqd.png

16biwqd.png

282 ms

33fffqs.gif

33fffqs.gif

609 ms

33o79tu.gif

33o79tu.gif

649 ms

kfnKte7Z7RY

kfnKte7Z7RY

115 ms

UmqNoVFKGSo

UmqNoVFKGSo

109 ms

03Sat557J1Q

03Sat557J1Q

106 ms

Q0ysqx7Yjfk

Q0ysqx7Yjfk

113 ms

cuOHpMOCTsw

cuOHpMOCTsw

120 ms

si-award-clean.png

si-award-clean.png

421 ms

avatar_a78b48f7b6dc_24.png

avatar_a78b48f7b6dc_24.png

41 ms

arrow_sprite.png

arrow_sprite.png

21 ms

rsu7er.gif

rsu7er.gif

599 ms

dffzhd.gif

dffzhd.gif

904 ms

1zzric2.gif

1zzric2.gif

882 ms

avatar_f26524fd8e5f_24.png

avatar_f26524fd8e5f_24.png

85 ms

nd97ch.gif

nd97ch.gif

630 ms

3534kg9.png

3534kg9.png

75 ms

x0z14i.png

x0z14i.png

79 ms

95pt89.gif

95pt89.gif

286 ms

4g12iw.gif

4g12iw.gif

594 ms

www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css

www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css

32 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

57 ms

yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js

yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js

248 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

105 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

182 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

182 ms

ga.js

ga.js

146 ms

impixu

impixu

282 ms

impixu

impixu

205 ms

236 ms

analytics.html

analytics.html

196 ms

login_check.html

login_check.html

50 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

293 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

494 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

146 ms

rapid-3.33.js

rapid-3.33.js

42 ms

rapidworker-1.2.js

rapidworker-1.2.js

38 ms

like.php

like.php

103 ms

ga.js

ga.js

79 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

68 ms

cs.js

cs.js

90 ms

yql

yql

219 ms

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

506 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

563 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

cedexis.radar.js

cedexis.radar.js

4 ms

Accessibility Review

instagiffer.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

instagiffer.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

instagiffer.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Instagiffer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Instagiffer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

instagiffer.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Instagiffer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: