10.7 sec in total
198 ms
9.6 sec
915 ms
Click here to check amazing Instipedia content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about instipedia.com
每日彩票【82295.com】国内最安全、彩种最齐全的大赢家彩票平台,提供★每日彩票下载地址_今日彩票网★网站、登录、入口、下载、网址、注册、投注等功能,彩种有快3、双色球、大乐透、11选5等二十多种。
Visit instipedia.comWe analyzed Instipedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 198 ms and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
instipedia.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value13.3 s
0/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.3
39/100
15%
Value13.7 s
10/100
10%
198 ms
2833 ms
206 ms
555 ms
585 ms
Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Instipedia.com, 14% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Instipedia.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.9 MB (80%)
4.9 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Instipedia.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 133.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Instipedia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.6 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Instipedia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (88%)
92
11
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Instipedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
instipedia.com
198 ms
www.instipedia.com
2833 ms
webfont.js
206 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
555 ms
style.min.css
585 ms
bootstrap.min.css
689 ms
magnific-popup.css
645 ms
component.css
677 ms
font-awesome.min.css
634 ms
jquery.mmenu.all.css
649 ms
mapbox.css
672 ms
chosen.css
718 ms
bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css
715 ms
slick.css
716 ms
slick-theme.css
716 ms
prettyphoto.css
866 ms
styles.min.css
735 ms
colors.css
739 ms
font.css
747 ms
main.css
985 ms
responsive.css
816 ms
select2.css
805 ms
city-autocomplete.css
814 ms
common.loading.css
857 ms
bootstrap-slider.css
863 ms
morris.css
935 ms
style.css
936 ms
flipclock.css
951 ms
main-new.css
968 ms
colors-new.css
952 ms
js_composer.min.css
1110 ms
jquery.js
980 ms
login.js
981 ms
search-ajax.js
1098 ms
single-ajax.js
1099 ms
approve-review.js
1100 ms
home-map.js
1101 ms
checkout.js
1141 ms
js
567 ms
api.js
567 ms
main.js
1042 ms
css
447 ms
review-submit.js
605 ms
raphael-min.js
541 ms
morris.js
514 ms
child-term.js
456 ms
submit-listing.js
1223 ms
auto-places.js
1219 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
1217 ms
mapbox.js
1182 ms
leaflet.markercluster.js
1175 ms
chosen.jquery.js
1176 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1173 ms
jquery.mmenu.min.all.js
1162 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1157 ms
select2.full.min.js
1128 ms
classie.js
1125 ms
modalEffects.js
1081 ms
2co.min.js
1045 ms
moment.js
1072 ms
bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js
1071 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
1016 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
961 ms
jquery-ui.js
1169 ms
drop-pin.js
1148 ms
slick.min.js
1146 ms
css
175 ms
css
177 ms
jquery.city-autocomplete.js
1104 ms
bootstrap-slider.js
1119 ms
lp-iconcolor.js
1116 ms
lp-gps.js
1002 ms
pricing.js
1002 ms
main.js
1003 ms
flipclock.min.js
1001 ms
main-new.js
1001 ms
recaptcha.js
1107 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1105 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1163 ms
recaptcha__en.js
775 ms
content-loader.gif
674 ms
instipedia-banner-image.jpg
1246 ms
instipedia-logo.png
702 ms
instipedia-home-icon.png
689 ms
columns-1.png
689 ms
mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFVZ0e.ttf
717 ms
mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN_r8OUuhs.ttf
1039 ms
mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UNirkOUuhs.ttf
1790 ms
mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOUuhs.ttf
1793 ms
mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN8rsOUuhs.ttf
1809 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf
1808 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xw.ttf
1796 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo58a-xw.ttf
1797 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58a-xw.ttf
1796 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
714 ms
memnYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUKWyV9hrIqY.ttf
1795 ms
mem6YaGs126MiZpBA-UFUK0Zdcg.ttf
1810 ms
memnYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUKXGUdhrIqY.ttf
1808 ms
memnYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUKWiUNhrIqY.ttf
1812 ms
memnYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUKW-U9hrIqY.ttf
1811 ms
common.js
826 ms
util.js
828 ms
geocoder.js
863 ms
fallback
863 ms
fallback
885 ms
fallback__ltr.css
430 ms
css
140 ms
logo_48.png
96 ms
icons8-win10.svg
67 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgotTLrwG09cvToLSkwFiEwk5AAA=
65 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
19 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
19 ms
instipedia.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
instipedia.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
instipedia.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Instipedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Instipedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
instipedia.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Instipedia. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: