7.8 sec in total
1.4 sec
5.4 sec
1 sec
Visit instr.by now to see the best up-to-date Instr content for Belarus and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about instr.by
Интернет-магазин
Visit instr.byWe analyzed Instr.by page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
instr.by performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
3/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value26.9 s
0/100
10%
Value48,730 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.273
45/100
15%
Value64.5 s
0/100
10%
1365 ms
351 ms
251 ms
253 ms
266 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Instr.by, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Instr.by.
Page size can be reduced by 736.3 kB (39%)
1.9 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Instr.by main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 945.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.6 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Instr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 475.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 475.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 139.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Instr.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 139.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (34%)
104
69
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Instr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
instr.by
1365 ms
bootstrap.min.css
351 ms
style.css
251 ms
style.css
253 ms
styles.css
266 ms
skitter.css
257 ms
css
77 ms
styles.css
257 ms
mootools-core.js
507 ms
core.js
366 ms
caption.js
368 ms
mootools-more.js
768 ms
slogin.js
379 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
634 ms
bootstrap.min.js
541 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
839 ms
touchwipe.min.js
541 ms
sidr.js
637 ms
script.js
639 ms
reset.css
643 ms
style.css
759 ms
css
100 ms
jquery-1.5.2.min.js
927 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
758 ms
jquery.animate-colors-min.js
926 ms
jquery.skitter.min.js
926 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
991 ms
body_bg.jpg
189 ms
new-instr-logo.png
186 ms
vk.jpg
186 ms
gplus.jpg
190 ms
Facebook.jpg
611 ms
reklama.png
389 ms
slide_13.jpg
1372 ms
slide_01.jpg
655 ms
slide_02.jpg
652 ms
slide_03.jpg
833 ms
slide_04.jpg
963 ms
slide_05.jpg
955 ms
dw713.jpg
1180 ms
slide_06.jpg
964 ms
slide_07.jpg
1170 ms
slide_08.jpg
1289 ms
slide_09.jpg
1447 ms
slide_10.jpg
1376 ms
slide_11.jpg
1453 ms
slide_12.jpg
1457 ms
dewalt.jpg
1440 ms
blac-and-decker.png
1529 ms
Stanley.jpg
1533 ms
TOUGHBUILT.jpg
1580 ms
makita.gif
1588 ms
elitech.gif
1595 ms
logoShatal.jpg
1600 ms
fenix.jpg
1664 ms
aeg_logo.jpg
1665 ms
Bosch_Logo10.jpg
1725 ms
SKIL%20logo.jpg
1731 ms
Ryobi-black.jpg
1703 ms
telwin.jpg
1734 ms
logo_11.jpg
1772 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
265 ms
junews_dcn660d2-59bb169f5e5171e9cc80b84c957348d7.jpg
1777 ms
4ccCHjovctZoFjdBOHBY_6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.woff
153 ms
junews_r18sdsapp06-01fb585691c4c45136bf7c64f2c76466.jpg
1686 ms
junews_newbosch12v-28be1472e3d5a83f61dc2b66e81d9d00.jpg
1721 ms
junews_dcd991dcd996-224367fa2200f70a80088afc96818346.jpg
1719 ms
junews_dewaltdcv515cordlessvacuum-df46c59427e21fb876403e8e28edb40b.jpg
1722 ms
junews_boschergonomicreciprocatingsaws-0e8b71130ff68889f20e4e7db5272d11.jpg
1727 ms
analytics.js
159 ms
watch.js
77 ms
JvVWCvq2Wh
1307 ms
junews_morakniv2016-6c9d3a3700e635dfb752b3f6c71bc00f.jpg
1555 ms
collect
57 ms
junews_ganzog801-ccdc7248d88ae56fbe97d84d7b6581f9.jpg
1428 ms
junews_rc111-c79112ade42439417ad13d8f67e3556e.jpg
1418 ms
junews_img0556ke-3d08ddd81755a60b0c8c52f3cce0b0f4.jpg
1419 ms
junews_photo20160311121546-40b1c9fada9360d22d93703abf6b0b0c.jpg
1239 ms
junews_fenixhl60r01-b23d6d561e7af6ff74a17cd1625a572e.jpg
1144 ms
instr.jpg
1139 ms
instr_2.jpg
2280 ms
3%20year%20warranty_RU.jpg
2067 ms
dewalt-service-logo.jpg
1270 ms
Sertificate%20DeWALT.jpg
1167 ms
instagram.png
869 ms
vk.png
867 ms
youtube.png
907 ms
googlpluslogo.png
904 ms
twitter.png
1014 ms
facebook.png
1000 ms
search-bg.png
1058 ms
search-b.gif
1053 ms
widget_ru_RU.js
286 ms
searchfield.gif
1031 ms
10686_prev_170x170.jpg
1026 ms
bg_banner_cost.png
1152 ms
dewalt-d26420_170x170.jpg
1146 ms
black&decker-adv1210-xk1_170x170.jpg
1109 ms
wortex_bd_1415_dli_170x170.jpg
1110 ms
listMark.gif
1207 ms
glyphicons-halflings.png
1203 ms
tab3.jpg
1199 ms
copiright-bg.gif
1187 ms
up-arrow.png
1247 ms
prev.png
1242 ms
next.png
1201 ms
back-box-label-black.png
1169 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1324 ms
instr.by accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
instr.by best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
instr.by SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Instr.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Instr.by main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
instr.by
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Instr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: